No, Seriously, How Do the Guns Work on ‘Westworld’?

Westworld just wrapped up its second season on HBO, and even after 20 episodes, fans of the show like science fiction editor John Joseph Adams are still no closer to understanding how the show’s guns are able to kill robots but not humans.

“The creators must have some idea how these guns work,” Adams says in Episode 316 of the Geek’s Guide to the Galaxy podcast. “Could someone tell us? I want to know what they think, how they work. Because it doesn’t make any sense to me.”

Season 2 includes a passing reference to “sim bullets,” which makes Geek’s Guide to the Galaxy host David Barr Kirtley think that there must be something special about the bullets themselves.

“Maybe all the bullets have little incendiary things in them that cause them to self-destruct if they’re flying in the direction of a guest,” he says. “But in one scene they just hold the gun right against someone’s chest, and I don’t see how the bullet’s not going to kill you from that range, even if it is sort of programmed to self-destruct.”

Writer Sara Lynn Michener wonders if maybe it’s the guns that are special rather than the bullets. “You can have a gun that has paintball bullets in it, and you can have a gun that has real bullets in it,” she says, “and the gun determines, ‘All right, who am I aiming at?’, and decides which bullet to release based on that.”

But science fiction author Anthony Ha says that even if there is an explanation for how the guns work, he still doesn’t understand how humans are kept safe from other weapons such as arrows and axes.

“It definitely drives me crazy,” he says. “Do they have safeties on the swords here too? What is going on with this?”

Listen to the complete interview with John Joseph Adams, Sara Lynn Michener, and Anthony Ha in Episode 316 of Geek’s Guide to the Galaxy (above). And check out some highlights from the discussion below.

Anthony Ha on confusion:

“There are basically two main timelines, but what that overlooks is that there are also flashbacks and—we learn later—flash forwards within those timelines too, so it’s not the same as just tracking these two parallel paths. And I think that also ties to the point about some of the plots kind of spinning their wheels, particularly the timeline that’s further advanced and taking place after this flood. There really was not a lot of plot there, so I didn’t understand why—from both a narrative economy and clarity perspective—they didn’t just treat it as a frame story that you see in the first and last episodes. But the fact that you would flash back to that every episode or two and just have Bernard standing there looking disoriented, kind of furrowing his brow and everyone being like, ‘Why don’t you remember anything?’ It did kind of get old after a while, while also, I think, contributing to the confusion.”

Sara Lynn Michener on Westworld’s rich characters:

“There are these [wealthy] characters, who are, obviously, kind of awful people, and they went in deciding that they wanted to have this done to them. And then they realized that as soon as they give up the right to their bodies—because they want to participate in this, because they want to reap the rewards—they’re in this hell. Because they’re no longer in charge. They have signed over their intellectual property—literally—to the corporation. … And now they have been reduced to being slaves themselves in these realities that they bought and paid for, not realizing what they had actually signed up for, not realizing the implications. So I liked that, I liked all the moralizing of, ‘You made your bed and now you have to lie in it.’”

Sara Lynn Michener on religion:

“The difference in perspective between me and Dave might be because I was raised religious. Because being raised religious means you are raised in a very specific kind of bubble, where everything that you are told about the nature of reality turns out not to be true. Imagine being raised as a child believing in Santa, but your whole life is about Santa—not just Christmas. And so I feel like I am much more attracted to science fiction that just wants to go full-on metaphysical and talk about how we define these realities and how we decide what’s real, and I’m less interested in the specific details that make it feel real to me. I’m more interested in, ‘Why do the guests feel like it’s real? Why do the hosts feel like it’s real?’”

John Joseph Adams on ratings:

“The thing that depresses me is that [Westworld] will be seen as this standard-bearer for science fiction, as all big attempts to tell science fiction stories tend to be, so when one fails, or doesn’t perform up to expectations, it’s an excuse for other producers or networks not to pursue science fiction shows. … When a show like this doesn’t do as well, it’s more evidence that, ‘Oh no, we shouldn’t put more money into a brainy science fiction show, because people won’t watch it.’ Especially with the struggles that The Expanse has had. So I think it’s bad news in general for people who want brainy science fiction that this hasn’t done better, unfortunately.”

More Great WIRED Stories

Go Back to Top. Skip To: Start of Article.

Tesla Hits Its Goals, Lyft Buys Into Bikes, and More Car News This Week

Life is full of little disappointments. That’s why it’s so refreshing to occasionally see someone do something grand, and just a bit nutty. Like Elon Musk setting up a fully functional production tent in the Tesla’s factory’s backyard, in a improbable—and thus far successful!—bid to hit his 2018 production targets. Like Lyft, the little brother of American ride-hailing, spending $250 million on…bicycles? Like a developer taking a polluted ex-Ford factory in Minnesota and trying to turn it into a walker-friendly, net-zero energy planned community. Like the mere existence of the Polaris Slingshot, which is not quite a car and not quite a motorcycle, but tells us some important things about the future of transportation.

This week, it was all about lofty goals. Let’s get you caught up.

Headlines

Stories you might have missed from WIRED this week

  • With a little help from a final assembly line set up in a parking lot, Tesla hits its Model 3 production target—only about eight or so months behind schedule. CEO Elon Musk, always one for an exceedingly ambitious goals, responds with a new one: 6,000 Model 3s a week by the end of August.

  • The bike-share war went into high gear this week, when Lyft officially announced it had acquired the country’s largest bike-share operator, Motivate. The buy gives the ride-share company control over big-name systems like DC’s Capital Bikeshare, NYC’s CitiBike, and the Bay Area’s Ford GoBike. But it also gives it an all-of-the-above strategy for transportation domination—and some interesting bits of street corner real estate to play with.

  • Last month, a Cruise Chevy Bolt being driven manually bumped into a Cruise Chevy Bolt in autonomous mode. Kinda hilarious, sure, but the minor incident has lessons to teach about the challenge of building self-driving car tech.

  • From the ashes of an old Ford manufacturing plant rises a bold, green vision for the future of Minneapolis/St. Paul: a highly bikeable, net-zero energy community. But will the plan get past its neighborhood opposition—and are its promises even reasonable?

  • Transportation editor Alex Davies learns the Polaris Slingshot—not a car, not a motorcycle—is a terrible commuting partner. But it’s real fun when you get out of your routine and just drive. As autonomy begins to take over later this century, this fun part may be exactly the sort of driving activity that survives.

Dino Attack of the Week

If you thought Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom had a lot of dinos, check out this gathering. Over 150 Dinos—Ferrari Dinos, that is—got together in the automaker’s hometown of Maranello, Italy this week, to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the beloved car’s road debut.

Ferrari North America

Required Reading

News from elsewhere on the internet

Roborace’s Self-Driving Car Takes On England’s Swankiest Track

Once a year, the bucolic grounds of Goodwood House in West Sussex, England, are consumed by the smell of exhaust fumes, the sound of engines revving, and an excited crowd of 100,000 people, all wanting a look at the special cars on show. They gather here because Charles Gordon-Lennox, the 11th Duke of Richmond, likes to occasionally open his home to host the Goodwood Festival of Speed, a celebration of all the history, the heritage, and the future of motor racing.

This week, among the supercars, hypercars, and pure racing cars, Goodwood visitors will spot a low, black machine streaking in near silence up the winding driveway to the estate, which for the event is transformed into a 1.16-mile hill climb track.

“We’re pretty sure when the car appears, people will freak out,” says Rod Chong, deputy CEO of Roborace. And it will be the first machine to give the hill climb a try without a human in command, so there are some nerves. “We aren’t sleeping very well right now,” Chong says.

Robocar is an autonomous race car developed by Roborace, which is starting the world’s first motorsports series for self-driving cars. Its vehicle doesn’t have the constraint of keeping a human driver safe, so the design team—led by Daniel Simon, known for his work on Tron: Legacy—dropped the cockpit and whittled away the central spine of the vehicle. The wheels flare out at the corners, behind huge aero ducts.

Roborace first unveiled its car in February 2017, with long-term plans to build a whole bunch, and pit them against one another on a track. The design uses four electric motors for a total of more than 500 horsepower. As in most self-driving prototypes, a computer tries to make sense of the world with input from lidar, GPS, cameras, and radar. Teams who want to race will use the same hardware platform but will design their own software, looking for a racing edge.

Robocar was built to run on professional race courses used by Formula E, the electric racing series with which Roborace is associated. It’s designed for neat and tidy pavement, clear road edges, and immobile crash barriers that can be used as reference points. Here, it will have none of those things. “The challenge with Goodwood is that it’s a temporary structure that only gets built up the week of the event,” Chong says. His car will have to contend with indistinct grass curbs and protective hay bales that might move if someone else crashes into them or they get kicked by the crowd.

The first big test at Goodwood comes Monday, when the team will run the track in a private test, ahead of the show days on Friday, Saturday, and Sunday. “Monday is the first time we’ll have tested in the real environment,” says Bryn Balcombe, Roborace’s chief strategy officer.

The biggest issue the team anticipates is the trees. The canopy is so thick over the driveway that satellite GPS signals can’t make it through the leaves, which means the car won’t be able to accurately map its position. Instea, the team has written software for the hill climb that relies on lidar laser sensors for real-time environment perception. Luckily, running on the Formula E race track last December in Hong Kong gave them some experience to build on. There, the tall buildings posed a similar obstacle to GPS reception.

At Goodwood, the Roborace team plans to run the course very early each morning, before things get started, just to rescan it and check if any bales have shifted. Then they’ll run the car in whatever slot they’re assigned, in between the groups of touring cars, 1950s Formula 1 cars, the road-going racers, and whatever other magnificent vehicles make the trip.

For this year’s outing, the team isn’t looking to set any records. They’ll be happy just to drive, and complete, the course three days in a row. That’s not to say they’re taking it slow. “We want to run to a good level of speed—it’ll be visually exciting, believe me,” Chong says. But really it’s a proof of concept and a chance to remind a petrol-head crowd that the future might be electric and autonomous, but it will definitely still be fun.


More Great WIRED Stories

A Facebook Bug, Election Meddling, and More Security News This Week

It was a holiday week for July Fourth, but there was still plenty going on in the security world. WIRED took a deep look at a budding partnership between the Army’s Cyber Command and the Pentagon’s Defense Digital Service group. DDS brings private-sector tech expertise to the government, and this new collaboration adds Army technologists to the mix to work on difficult development challenges for the Department of Defense. Meanwhile, a different DOD program run by the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency provides mobile, desktop, and browser apps to dozens of US defense agencies through an ultrasecure app store that has some crucial differences from commercial platforms.

WIRED also looked at where Congress and the Supreme Court may take privacy precedent and regulations in the future as digital technologies alter the privacy landscape. Speaking of which, find an hour this weekend to do a quick and easy audit of your mobile and desktop apps. Check up on what data they’re able to access and collect from you, and make sure you’re not running any programs that are overreaching.

There’s more! As always, we’ve rounded up all the news we didn’t break or cover in depth this week. Click on the headlines to read the full stories. And stay safe out there.

Facebook Briefly Unblocked a Number of Blocked Accounts

Facebook announced on Monday that a programming bug caused the service to briefly unblock a number of accounts that users had blocked. The glitch reportedly affected a small portion of Facebook users for just a week—but at the scale of Facebook, even “small” mishaps can have massive repercussions. The company said it notified a whopping 800,000 users that they may have been affected.

While the bug was live, affected users could have had accounts they previously blocked message them or see things they shared with mutual friends, although the accidentally unblocked accounts still couldn’t directly see a user’s page. Facebook wouldn’t provide any additional information about the bug, but for people who rely on blocking to keep them emotionally and/or physically safe, the incident is more than just a minor hiccup.

Senate Committee Affirms Intelligence Community Assessment of Russian Election Meddling

On Tuesday, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence published findings of a review of the 2017 Intelligence Community official assessment, which concluded that Russia did interfere in the 2016 US presidential election to support Donald Trump’s candidacy. After reviewing documents and intelligence and interviewing investigators, analysts, and other officials, the committee found that the IC had produced “a sound intelligence product.” The committee released an unclassified report and also prepared a classified version. The review was launched last year amid doubts about the IC’s findings. It noted a couple of small things it would have wanted the IC to investigate further, including the role of the Russian-controlled media outlet RT. But overall, the report raised few questions or concerns.

Samsung Smartphone Bug Sends Out Random Photos

Bugs abounded this week, with another problematic one in which some recent models of Samsung smartphones, including the Galaxy Note 8 and Galaxy S9, were reportedly texting out photos from users’ camera rolls to random contacts without leaving a trace of the errant messages. The bug seems to have been in the Samsung Messages app, which is the default texting app on Samsung mobile devices. The problem may have been related to interoperability issues as carriers upgrade to the new Rich Communication Services protocol that the industry plans to use as a replacement for SMS texting. Samsung users found some workarounds for the issue, including revoking permission for the Samsung Messages app to access their photos. Samsung said it was aware of the reports.


More Great WIRED Stories

‘Sorry to Bother You’ Review: A Dizzying Satire That Hungers for Truth

In Boots Riley’s trippy new film Sorry to Bother You, hunger is the main throughline. The hunger for truth. The hunger for justice. The hunger to succeed personally, and even more so in one’s professional life. At RegalView, a low-level telemarketing firm in Oakland, one path to success presents itself in the form of code-switching. The disaffected Cassius Green (LaKeith Stanfield) is hungry to prove himself.

He’s a damaged soul eager for anything other than failure and hardship. On the advice of a coworker (Danny Glover), Cassius begins to use a “white voice” when speaking with prospective customers—what white people “wished they sounded like,” Glover explains—and its pay-off is immediate. Cassius becomes the company’s top salesman, earning the title of “Power Caller” and a promotion upstairs, where it’s required he talk in his white voice at all times.

But professional advancement comes with a moral clause. Cassius is wedged between doing what is right and what is profitable; one reason he took the job in the first place was to help his uncle save his home, which was in foreclosure. These are questions of survival Riley is volleying at us—what, exactly, are you willing to give up for the American Dream? Your friends? Your principles? For someone like Cassius, there are always conditions to Making It. For black people, in particular, success has its own fine print.

Sorry to Bother You is a deliciously untame thing: an allegorical satire about the exploitation of labor and land. (It joins a cohort of black futurity coming to the screen in recent years, including Get Out by Jordan Peele and Random Acts of Flyness, which debuts in August on HBO; Nnedi Okorafor’s Who Fears Death is also in development at HBO.) Like reality, the film is a genre mash-up in the most satisfying of ways—part workplace comedy, part existential drama, with elements of science fiction. The movie’s heart centers on economic injustice and class struggle. It’s heavy stuff, and rightfully so. These are heavy times. But longtime activist and rapper Riley, who wrote and directed the film, never burdens the audience with too much at once: he garnishes the film’s steady unease with splashes of dark humor courtesy of its leading cast (an exceptional Stanfield, Tessa Thompson, and Armie Hammer).

The tsuris surrounding Cassius worsens as coworkers form a union and threaten RegalView brass with a strike. “Trouble’s already here,” Squeeze (Steven Yeun), the lead organizer, says at one point. “I’m just helping folks fix it.” But it’s too late for Cassius; intoxicated by the taste of success, he refuses to join their cause, even as his artist girlfriend, Detroit (a radically enchanting Thompson), finds his new situation at odds with her own beliefs. (According to one of her t-shirts: “The future is female ejaculation.”)

Riley’s gonzo dystopia begins to unfurl in greater detail once Cassius settles in on the executive level, where he sells slave labor “over the phone.” RegalView, as it turns out, is part of a larger corporation called WorryFree Solutions. Its deranged visionary of a CEO, the bro-y, coked-out Steve Lift (a role Hammer was destined to play) offers people lifetime employment, housing, and food in exchange for non-stop labor. WorryFree, however, is anything but paradise. Individuals who sign up live in prison-like accommodations, eat scraps, and work as indentured servants for the rest of their lives. It’s a perverse critique of human capital—the gig economy, mass incarceration, an underpaid workforce in one sinister illustration—and an existence that doesn’t feel too far from what one possible future holds in false utopias like Silicon Valley. In this, Riley gives us one of the year’s sharpest pieces of political art. Sorry to Bother You arises from the best kind of fiction, one inspired from the fury and turbulence of real life.

In the film’s final and most revealing act Cassius is stirred from slumber. After a one-on-one meeting with Lift takes an absurd turn, he’s forced to reconsider the cost and question of his success (I won’t spoil the surprise here). For his part, Riley reconstructs the do-anything pursuit of capitalism into a collage of racial horror. The conclusion is both shocking and oddly poetic, but never once did it read as unbelievable. Throughout, the film’s aims remain locked on the issue of hunger. Only, in the end, Riley isn’t afraid to take it one step further and show how the powerless, and people of color in particular, no matter how much fight they put up, ultimately get swallowed whole.


More Great WIRED Stories

Flattened Fluids Help Scientists Understand Oceans and Atmospheres

Turbulence, the splintering of smooth streams of fluid into chaotic vortices, doesn’t just make for bumpy plane rides. It also throws a wrench into the very mathematics used to describe atmospheres, oceans and plumbing. Turbulence is the reason why the Navier-Stokes equations—the laws that govern fluid flow—are so famously hard that whoever proves whether or not they always work will win a million dollars from the Clay Mathematics Institute.

Quanta Magazine


About

Original story reprinted with permission from Quanta Magazine, an editorially independent publication of the Simons Foundation whose mission is to enhance public understanding of science by covering research developments and trends in mathematics and the physical and life sciences.

But turbulence’s unreliability is, in its own way, reliable. Turbulence almost always steals energy from larger flows and channels it into smaller eddies. These eddies then transfer their energy into even smaller structures, and so on down. If you switch off the ceiling fan in a closed room, the air will soon fall still, as large gusts dissolve into smaller and smaller eddies that then vanish entirely into the thickness of the air.

But when you flatten reality down to two dimensions, eddies join forces instead of dissipating. In a curious effect called an inverse cascade, which the theoretical physicist Robert Kraichnan first fished out of the Navier-Stokes equations in the 1960s, turbulence in a flattened fluid passes energy up to bigger scales, not down to smaller ones. Eventually, these two-dimensional systems organize themselves into large, stable flows like vortexes or river-like jets. These flows, rather like vampires, support themselves by sucking away energy from turbulence, instead of the other way around.

Animation by Goddard Space Flight Center/Cosmos Studios/NASA

While the inverse cascade effect has been known for decades, a mathematical, quantitative prediction of what that final, stable flow looks like has eluded theorists. But a glimmer of hope came in 2014, when Jason Laurie, now at Aston University in the United Kingdom, and his colleagues published a full description of the flow’s shape and speed under strict, specific conditions. Since then, new simulations, lab experiments and theoretical calculations published as recently as last month have both justified the team’s calculations and explored different cases where their prediction starts to break down.

All this might seem like only a thought experiment. The universe is not flat. But geophysicists and planetary scientists have long suspected that real oceans and atmospheres often behave like flat systems, making the intricacies of two-dimensional turbulence surprisingly relevant to real problems.

Lucy Reading-Ikkanda/Quanta Magazine

After all, on Earth, and especially on the gas giant planets like Jupiter and Saturn, weather is confined to thin, flattish slabs of atmosphere. Large patterns like hurricanes or the Gulf Stream — and Jupiter’s huge horizontal cloud bands and Great Red Spot—might all be feeding on energy from smaller scales. In the last few years, researchers analyzing winds both on Earth and on other planets have detected signatures of energy flowing to larger scales, the telltale sign of two-dimensional turbulence. They’ve begun mapping the conditions under which that behavior seems to stop or start.

The hope, for a small but dedicated community of researchers, is to use the quirky but simpler world of two-dimensional fluids as a fresh entry point into processes that have otherwise proved impenetrably messy. “They can actually make progress” in two dimensions, said Brad Marston, a physicist at Brown University, “which is more than what we can say for most of our turbulence work.”

Up in the Air

On Sept. 14, 2003, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration sent an aircraft into Isabel, a Category 5 hurricane bearing down on the Atlantic Coast with winds gusting to 203 knots—the strongest readings ever observed in the Atlantic.

NOAA wanted to get readings of turbulence at the bottom of a hurricane, crucial data for improving hurricane forecasts. This was the first—and last—time a crewed aircraft ever tried. At its lowest, the flight skimmed just 60 meters above the churning ocean. Eventually salt spray clogged up one of the plane’s four engines, and the pilots lost an engine in the middle of the storm. The mission succeeded, but it was so harrowing that afterward, NOAA banned low-level flights like this entirely.

About a decade later, David Byrne got interested in these data. Byrne, a physicist at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, had previously studied turbulent energy transfer in lab experiments. He wanted to see if he could catch the process in nature. He contacted Jun Zhang, an NOAA scientist who had been booked on the very next flight into Isabel (a flight that never took off). By analyzing the distribution of wind speeds, the two calculated the direction in which energy was traveling between large and small fluctuations.

Starting at about 150 meters above the ocean and leading up into the large flow of the hurricane itself, turbulence began to behave the way it does in two dimensions, the pair discovered. This could have been because wind shear forced eddies to stay in their respective thin horizontal layers instead of stretching vertically. Whatever the reason, though, the analysis showed that turbulent energy began flowing from smaller scales to larger scales, perhaps feeding Isabel from below.

Their work suggests that turbulence may offer hurricanes an extra source of fuel, perhaps explaining why some storms maintain strength even when conditions suggest they should weaken. Zhang now plans to use uncrewed flights and better sensors to help bolster that case. “If we can prove that, it would be really amazing,” he said.

Created with Wind Tunnel

On Jupiter, a much larger world with an even flatter atmosphere, researchers have also pinpointed where turbulence switches between two-dimensional and three-dimensional behavior.

Wind speed measurements taken by the Voyager probes, which flew past Jupiter in the 1970s, had already suggested that Jupiter’s large flows gain energy from smaller eddies. But in 2017, Peter Read, a physicist at the University of Oxford, and Roland Young, his postdoc at the time, made a wind speed map using data from the space probe Cassini, which swung past Jupiter in 2000 on its way to Saturn. They saw energy flowing into larger and larger eddies, the hallmark of two-dimensional turbulence.

But nothing about Jupiter is simple. On smaller scales—across patches of surface about the distance between New York and Los Angeles or less—energy dissipated instead, indicating that other processes must also be afoot. Then in March, the Juno spacecraft orbiting Jupiter found that the planet’s surface features extend deep into its atmosphere. The data suggest that not just fluid dynamics but magnetic fields sculpt the cloud bands.

For Freddy Bouchet, who studies turbulence at the École Normale Supérieure (ENS) in Lyon, France, this isn’t too discouraging, since the two-dimensional models can still help. “I don’t think anybody believes the analogy should be perfect,” he said.

Progress on Paper

At the end of 2017, Bouchet and Eric Woillez, also at ENS, sketched out their own theoretical account of how two-dimensional fluid flow can describe a rotating system such as the atmosphere of a planet.

Their work shows how flows built from smaller turbulence can match the enormous pattern of alternating bands visible on Jupiter through a backyard telescope. That “makes it really relevant for discussing real phenomena,” Bouchet said.

Bouchet’s work relies on considering the statistics of the large-scale flows, which exchange energy and other quantities in a balance with their environment. But there’s another path to predicting the form these flows will take, and it starts with those same obstreperous Navier-Stokes equations that lie at the root of fluid dynamics.

For two “totally fruitless” years at the beginning of this decade, Gregory Falkovich, a pen-and-paper theorist at Israel’s Weizmann Institute of Science, stared at those equations. He tried to write out how the flow of energy would balance between small turbulent eddies and a bigger flow feeding on them in a simple case: a flat, square box.

A single term, related to pressure, stood in the way of a solution. So Falkovich just dropped it. By discarding that troublesome term and assuming that the eddies in this system are too short-lived to interact with each other, Falkovich and his colleagues tamed the equations enough to solve the Navier-Stokes equations for this case. Then he tasked Jason Laurie, his postdoc at the time, with running numerical simulations that proved it. “It’s always nice when you have an exact result in turbulence,” Marston said. “Those are rare.”

In the team’s 2014 paper, they found a formula for how the velocity in the resulting large flow—a big vortex, in this situation—would change with distance from its own center. And since then, various teams have filled in the theoretical rationale to excuse Falkovich’s lucky shortcut.

Hoping for payoff in the pure math of fluids and for insight into geophysical processes, physicists have also pushed the formula outside a simple square box, trying to figure out where it stops working. Just switching from a square to a rectangle makes a dramatic difference, for example. In this case, turbulence feeds river-like flows called jets in which the formula starts to fail.

As of now, even the mathematics of the simplest case, the square box, isn’t totally settled. Falkovich’s formula describes the large stable vortex itself, but not the turbulent eddies that still flicker and fluctuate around it. If they vary enough, as they might in other situations, these fluctuations will overwhelm the stable flow. Just in May, though, two former members of Falkovich’s lab—Corentin Herbert, also at ENS, and Anna Frishman of Princeton University—published a paper describing the size of these fluctuations. “It teaches a little bit what the limitations of the approach are,” Herbert said.

But their hope, ultimately, is to describe a far richer reality. For Frishman, the pictures returned from Juno’s mission over Jupiter—showing a fantasyland of jets and tornadoes swirling like cream poured into the solar system’s largest coffee—are a driving influence. “If it’s something that I could help understand, that would be cool,” she said.

Original story reprinted with permission from Quanta Magazine, an editorially independent publication of the Simons Foundation whose mission is to enhance public understanding of science by covering research developments and trends in mathematics and the physical and life sciences.

Can Google Really Launch a Viable Videogame Platform?

Google, it seems, is looking to get into the videogame business.

Over the past few months—most notably, and most recently, on the gaming site Kotaku—rumors have been circulating that the search giant is working on a multi-pronged games initiative that would involve both hardware and a streaming platform, codenamed “Yeti.” Reportedly, Google is looking to pull game developers under its umbrella through either cooperation or acquisition and met with executives at both E3 and the Game Developers Conference to gauge their interest in the efforts, whatever they may be.

But a few meetings and some investment money isn’t enough to build a successful gaming platform. Does Google have what it takes? Moreover, does the company’s history say anything about their potential future in the industry?

Google’s been interested in videogames for a long time, for reasons that should be pretty obvious. Gaming is a huge, lucrative business that could potentially give Google a lot more eyes for its advertising. In 2014, they made a play for the big time by trying to buy Twitch, a deal that ultimately fell through but was likely influential in the company beefing up YouTube Gaming—a platform built around streaming, Let’s Plays, and generally trying to do everything that Twitch does but with that extra Google sheen.

Likewise, rumors of Google testing the waters in the console world have been around for almost the company’s entire tenure in tech. Notably, Google internally incubated Niantic, the augmented-reality-game company that made roughly all of the dollars (nearly a billion of them in 2016) by collaborating with Nintendo on Pokémon Go. Naturally, Google’s probably smarting from the pain of letting Niantic go before that smash hit landed.

But what do those past ambitions, and the success Google’s had with turning YouTube into a hub for videogame culture, indicate about the company’s present actions to enter the industry? That’s harder to suss out. Google’s excellence as a tech giant has largely been in presentation: all of its big wins have come through creating attractive, useful ways to consume existing content. Even its hardware initiatives are based on content presentation: the Chromebook‘s great innovation is being, essentially, a web browser tied to a minimally taxing device. Getting a win in the already busy world of gaming would require much more than that.

Over the years, through YouTube and the Google Play Store, the company has proven it can create an ecosystem where videogame content can thrive. If Google is to launch a gaming platform, its presentational savvy—the ability the company has to make using your technology feel slick, interesting, and healthily interconnected—will have to be the backbone. Ultimately, Google can (and seems to be willing to) pay for content. But it’s the package around it that’s going to matter most.

The prospect of a streaming service is more complicated. As we’ve discussed before, the extant internet infrastructure isn’t really supportive of a robust streaming service for games as it stands. There’s just too much data that needs to move at too fast a speed. Google’s one leg up in this conversation is their own ongoing infrastructure investment: Google Fiber. While Fiber isn’t nearly as widespread as Google might like, coupling Fiber with whatever Yeti ends up being could at least ensure it works well enough to be compelling to the people fortunate enough to have the bandwidth for it. That, however, might end up being a small fraction of the gaming population.

For a tech giant like Google, though, almost no hurdle is insurmountable if the right resources are put behind it. However, if the company does want to truly create a compelling gaming environment, there’s one element that might prove extremely necessary: moderation. As it stands, YouTube gaming and the Google Play gaming portal are very messy communities and if they’re integrated into a larger platform, it would behoove their parent company to keep a closer eye on them. YouTube’s problems are well documented, and Google Play is, well, the best place to download illegitimate mobile emulators, if that’s your thing. Google has the power to produce a compelling place for games, but it’ll take work to make it useful and robust. Otherwise, it’ll be as hard to parse as your YouTube recommendations.


More Great WIRED Stories

Weekend Tech Deals: Breville, Ecobee, Ecovacs, SNES Classic

Another Independence Day has come and gone. Hopefully, you were careful and didn’t do anything dangerous with fireworks and instead just loaded up on some down-home cooking and face time with your favorite family members. The summer rages on, however, and that’s why, with the help of our friends at TechBargains, we’ve picked six choice deals for you to browse this weekend.

Ecobee3 Wi-Fi Smart Thermostat with 3 Room Sensors for $219 (was $289).

Even though the Nest gets all the attention, we love Ecobee’s thermostats. Why, you ask? The temperature sensors that you can place around your home make a difference in keeping your home cool during the hot summer months. And, it’s controllable via Amazon Alexa, to boot.

Neato Botvac D3 Connected Robot Vacuum for $199.99 (was $299.99).

Neato knows how to make a good robovac, and we know because we’ve tested a few recently. This low-end Botvac Connected seems like another decent model from Neato, and it’s selling for only $200 right now.

Breville Smart Oven Pro 1800W Convection Toaster Smart Oven for $199.95 (was $279.99).

Breville’s Smart Ovens are often ranked among the top toaster ovens you can buy. Normally, you’d pay almost $300 for a compact, versatile appliance like this but right now you can grab this beauty for only two Benjamins. Apartment dwellers, this is a deal you should consider.

Dell Vostro Small Desktop for $539 (was $898.57).

If you’re anything like us, you love tech that barely takes up any space. That’s why you might dig this compact Dell desktop. Even though it’s small enough to tuck behind a monitor or TV, you get full quad-core 8th generation Intel power that can handle everyday tasks without breaking a sweat.

WD Blue 1TB Solid State Drive for $199.99 (was $247.78).

There’s never enough storage to fit all the stuff you need for your digital life. So, upgrade your computer (whether it’s a laptop, desktop, or even a PS4) with a spacious 1 TB solid state drive. It’s got the space and it’s got the zippy responsiveness we’ve come to expect from SSD-type storage. And, most importantly, it won’t hurt your bank account too badly.

SNES Classic in stock for $79.99

People are amped up about the return of Nintendo’s NES Classic…but did you know the SNES Classic is also back in stock? Grab one before it’s too late!

When you buy something using the retail links in our stories, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Read more about how this works.

Proud Cop Shows Off His K9 Partner’s Hidden Talent

Allen and Spike have been helping to keep their community safe together for the past six years. In that time, the two have been involved in numerous drug busts and criminal apprehensions. But their work isn’t without some lighter moments as well.

In an adorable video posted this week, Allen decided to show off another one of Spike’s special abilities — singing. Specifically, singing along

with the chorus of 2000’s hit single by the Baha Men, “Who Let The Dogs Out?”

Yes, it’s an unusual talent, but Spike’s partner couldn’t be prouder.

Family Discovers Dog’s Secret Arrangement With A Local Baker

Chito lives with the Cabrera family in Mexico. It’s there that the adorable dachshund has taken it upon himself to serve as a guard dog of sorts, keeping watch over things at home during the day and alerting his people when strangers approach. Or so his family thought.

This guard dog was actually being vigilant for a much different reason — and that explains his waistline.

Recently, the Cabreras made an interesting discovery, and they caught it on video. The footage they captured shows Chito posted at their gate as usual as a local baker approaches on a bike with his tasty wares. Without hesitating, the baker hands Chito a secret meal, which he accepts with a wagging tail.

This doesn’t appear to be a one-time thing.

Woman Buys Lettuce — Then Realizes Someone’s Living Inside It

When she got a closer look, she noticed that someone — not something — was perched atop the leaves.

It was a tiny frog.

As she turned on her phone to take a video, the shy little animal looked up at her, and then started burrowing down further into the lettuce for shelter. He’d just been on quite the journey, and probably wasn’t ready for much more excitement.

Airport Security Finds Strangest Thing Hidden Under Man’s Clothes

Until then, the officers look forward to watching their progress.

“By preventing the smuggling attempt, [the team] have also ensured that the birds and eggs received the immediate care and attention that they needed,” Grant Miller, head of Heathrow’s CITES team, told the BBC. “The frontline work of my team is key to tackling the international illegal wildlife trade, which does so much environmental damage and threatens the survival of endangered animals.”

Mom Dog Who Lost Her Babies Was So Sad Until She Met These Lost Puppies

The rescue had recently taken in a mama dog who had lost her puppies while living on the streets. She was heartbroken and defeated when they found her, and it was clear she missed her puppies so much and couldn’t understand what had happened to them.

“She was walking round with food in her mouth trying to find them to feed them,” Hilary Anderson, cofounder of Barking Mad Dog Rescue, told The Dodo. “So sad.”

When the shoebox puppies arrived in the rescue’s care, they realized that the puppies needed a mom and the mama dog they had just rescued needed puppies to care for — so they decided to bring them together.

Congo Tries To Sell A Dozen Rare Wild Gorillas To Nightmare Zoo

Dr. Mark Jones, associate director of Born Free Foundation UK, says the consequences for these animals could be deadly if the Congo’s plan were to move forward.

“Primates in particular are highly social,” Jones told The Dodo. “Capturing live great apes from the wild usually entails disrupting entire social groups and killing other family members, with devastating consequences for family groups. Given the precarious status of these species, the proposed transfers could have a very significant conservation impact.”

In a letter sent to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species earlier this week, Born Free and other advocacy groups pushed for the plan to be reconsidered, as the removal of endangered species from the wild is technically illegal under the Congo’s national law.

Over 100 People Show Up At Shelter To Comfort Dogs During Fireworks

While the shelter normally permits volunteers to walk and play with the dogs, the staff realized their kennels were the safest, most secure spots for the dogs to be that evening. Fireworks can often trigger a flight response in dogs, so after 7 p.m., each pup was settled into their kennel for the night.

“We also had volunteers walking around spraying a bit of lavender oil [which promotes relaxation], and had classical music playing through the speakers,” Santiago said. “All of those things, in combination with the volunteers, really helped.”

While Santiago admits the “Calming Canines” event was somewhat of an experiment, there’s no doubt the shelter will be employing the same routine for next July 4th, and on New Year’s Eve.

Seagulls Keep Turning Up Drunk And No One Knows Why

Throughout the last couple of weeks, the RSPCA has been receiving a bunch of very unusual calls from beachgoers and people hanging out by the water — about drunk seagulls. At first, everyone at the rescue was a bit confused, but as soon as they went out to collect some of the seagulls in question, they realized why everyone was so concerned.

“At first, the birds look like they have botulism [an illness caused by bacteria] but then, after vomiting, most seem to recover,” Jo Daniel, an officer with the RSPCA, said in a press release. “The birds absolutely stink of alcohol when we collect them so now our vans smell like pubs!”

U.S. Is About To Allow Hunting Of World’s Most Endangered Wolf

In 2016, the USFWS announced it would stop the protection plan and round up the survivors to put them in captivity. It was postponed after public outcry, but now the new federal plan, which was proposed by USFWS late last month, again has conservationists deeply fearful for the future of the species.

“The USFWS rightly notes that landowner support is critical to the future of red wolf recovery,” Wheeler said. “But that support can’t be achieved through the unregulated hunting and trapping of red wolves that happen to wander onto private land. This claim, offered without any evidence to uphold it, defies both history and common sense and ignores the fact that humans are the root cause of most red wolf mortalities.”

Elephant Who Spent 50 Years Begging Always Hoped Life Would Get Better

“Raju became a symbol of hope for captive, abused elephants all over the world,” Wildlife SOS said in a statement. “His spirit was all but broken, a testament to the ordeals he had been through.”

Raju was brought to the Wildlife SOS rescue center, where veterinarians rushed to treat his leg, which had been seriously injured by the shackle. He was also suffering from severe malnutrition, foot ailments and painful abscesses on his shoulders and hips from his life being ridden on the streets.

That was four years ago — and now, Raju is so content living life as a free elephant. On Wednesday, the Wildlife SOS staff surprised him with a party complete with decorations, toys and treats to celebrate his rescue anniversary.

The Future of Former EPA Chief Scott Pruitt’s Anti-Science Legacy

Gone is the boss who loved first-class travel to places like Morocco and Rome, forced his staffers to find him an apartment (and a used Trump hotel mattress), and asked fast-food executives to hire his wife. But EPA administrator Scott Pruitt’s many scandals haven’t been the real bugaboo for environmental advocates—rather, it’s been his rollback of environmental regulations on toxic waste, tailpipe emissions, air pollution, and greenhouse gases.

And in fact, Pruitt’s replacement might be more effective at gutting environmental protection than Pruitt himself.

Pruitt left office Thursday after questions of lavish spending, mismanagement, and ethical lapses. He was the target of 13 investigations by the EPA’s own inspector general, according to The New York Times. In June, a federal judge ordered Pruitt to produce documents supporting his statements on CNBC that humans were not a major contributor to climate change.

So when Pruitt’s resignation was tweeted by President Trump on Thursday afternoon, there was relief among many EPA employees, according to Jeff Ruch, executive director of Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, a non-profit legal group that represents civil servants from several federal agencies. “They were overjoyed,” said Ruch, who spoke to several EPA employees after Pruitt left. “It was ‘Ding-dong, the witch is dead.’”

In fact, the scene outside EPA headquarters in Washington got a bit nutty yesterday afternoon, as a man wearing an oversized papier-mâché Pruitt head posed for pictures with happy EPA staffers.

That glee may be fleeting. For now, Pruitt’s replacement is Andrew Wheeler, a coal industry lobbyist who worked briefly at the EPA 25 years ago and will return as the acting administrator. He was approved as deputy administrator by the Senate in April 2018, but Wheeler would face a second Senate vote if Trump nominates him to become the permanent agency head.

From 1995 to 2009, Wheeler was a staff member for James Inhofe, a Republican senator from Oklahoma who is one of Congress’s fiercest climate-deniers. Then, as a lobbyist, Wheeler represented the largest coal-mining operation in the United States, Murray Energy, for more than a decade. In 2017, Murray Energy gave Pruitt an “action plan” to overturn existing EPA rules on mercury pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, and air pollution that crosses state lines.

So far, the White House and other federal agencies are on track to pass 16 of the rollbacks. Under Wheeler, “the administration’s agenda won’t change,” says Vicky Arroyo, executive director of the Georgetown Climate Center, a non-profit group at the Georgetown Law School that works with state officials on federal environmental regulatory issues. “Because Wheeler has deeper roots in DC, knows his way around these issues, and has built more relationships than Pruitt,” Arroyo says, “he might be more effective at completing [the White House] agenda.”

Just as Pruitt urged Trump to abandon the Paris Climate Agreement, Wheeler has attacked mainstream climate science, writing in 2010 that the UN’s International Panel on Climate Change was biased. “The UN IPCC has blurred the lines between science and advocacy to the point where they are unable to separate situational awareness from proposed remedies,” Wheeler wrote in a blog on his law firm’s website. “They have been advocating for specific policy actions and ignoring the original charter of informing the public on the state of science.”

At his Senate confirmation hearing in November 2017, Wheeler was noncommittal when faced with the federal government’s own climate report. “I believe that man has an impact on the climate, but what’s not completely understood is what the impact is,” Wheeler said during the hearing. At least on climate science, Pruitt and Wheeler are speaking from a similar book.

That matters because the Trump administration continues to block the Clean Power Plan, which seeks to limit greenhouse gas emissions from plants that burn fossil fuels. The plan was developed by President Obama, but Trump’s EPA reversed course and is now asking a federal court to oppose it. The Supreme Court blocked the plan from going into effect until a lower court can rule on its merits.

Under Wheeler’s tenure, Arroyo expects that her work will continue, with several states who are suing the EPA to enforce the Clean Power Plan, toxic air pollution rules, and climate protection rules. “It’s not a new day,” she says, “but we all have to be relieved that someone who is so blatantly corrupt is let go.”


More Great WIRED Stories