Startup Working on Contentious Pentagon AI Project Was Hacked

Last summer, a sign appeared on the door to a stuffy, windowless room at the office of Manhattan artificial-intelligence startup Clarifai. “Chamber of secrets,” it read, according to three people who saw it.

The notice was a joking reference to how the small team working inside was not permitted to discuss its work with others at Clarifai. Former and current employees say the group was working on a controversial Pentagon project using machine-learning algorithms to interpret drone-surveillance imagery—and that Clarifai’s secrets were less safe than they should have been.

A lawsuit filed by former employee Amy Liu this month alleges that Clarifai’s computer systems were compromised by one or more people in Russia, potentially exposing technology used by the US military to an adversary. The lawsuit says Clarifai learned of the breach last November, but that Clarifai’s CEO and other executives did not promptly report it to the Pentagon.

In her complaint, Liu, a former Air Force captain who worked in military intelligence, says she was unfairly terminated from her position as director of marketing for arguing that the company needed to disclose the incident. Another former employee told WIRED that his concerns over executives’ handling of the hack prompted him to leave the company.

Clarifai was working on a piece of Project Maven, former and current employees say, a Pentagon effort to infuse the US military with AI. Project Maven has triggered dissent inside Google, which took on a similar drone-analysis contract. More than 4,500 Google employees signed a letter protesting the project, saying they don’t want Google’s technology to potentially help kill people. The outcry prompted the company to issue ethical guidelines governing use of its AI technology, and promise not to renew its Project Maven contract when it expires next year.

Clarifai declined to comment on whether it had worked on Maven. A spokesperson said the security incident involved an “untargeted bot” that had infected a research server and did not access any data or code. The spokesperson said customers were notified of the incident, but declined to say when or whether that included the Pentagon.

Clarifai was founded in 2013 by Matthew Zeiler, a PhD who studied machine learning alongside professors who later became top AI researchers at Google and Facebook. The startup offers companies image recognition for tasks such as identifying celebrities and food.

Liu says she understands why the US military needs to expand its use of AI technology. She also says that the lack of transparency and poor security she witnessed at Clarifai made it an unsuitable place to help with that. “If now Google’s out of the running, and all they have left is companies like Clarifai, that’s sad and scary,” Liu says.

In response to questions about its approach to developing AI technology, a spokesperson referred WIRED to a statement of Clarifai’s core values on its website. They describe the company as “driven by our mission to accelerate the progress of humanity with continually improving AI.”

Liu says she was drawn into Clarifai’s military work when she helped draft Clarifai’s pitch for the Maven contract in June 2017. The paper argued that technology Clarifai had developed for commercial clients could be adapted to do things like detecting and counting cars and people in drone imagery. Liu says Clarifai won a six-month, $7 million contract last summer. Like Google, Clarifai worked on Maven as a subcontractor to ECS Federal, an IT contractor headquartered in Fairfax, Virginia.

LEARN MORE

The WIRED Guide to Artificial Intelligence

The Maven contract was a big win for Clarifai. An internal document from late 2017 shows that most of the startup’s deal prospects were less than $100,000. But Liu and others familiar with the project say executives obscured the fact Clarifai had become involved in military work, describing the project generically as a government contract that could save lives. Two people who worked on the project say they were not initially informed that the surveillance technology they were building was for the military.

The current and former employees said roughly 10 people worked on Clarifai’s Maven contract in the windowless room later tagged as the chamber of secrets. For some, the project’s purpose fully emerged only when, more than a month in, government workers who appeared to be military staff visited Clarifai’s offices to discuss the system being developed. Clarifai’s spokesperson says the company makes sure employees understand the projects they work on.

In early November, Clarifai was informed by internet service provider Cogent that one of its servers appeared to be attacking Indiana University, according to an initial incident report seen by WIRED. The report says that all the company’s code and the credentials to its Amazon Web Services account that stored customer data could have been compromised—and that the malware appeared to have originated from a computer in Russia. The Clarifai spokesperson said that the company’s investigation found that none of the company’s data or code was compromised.

In chat logs from November 7 reviewed by WIRED, Zeiler, the CEO, says the malware had been attempting to contact computers “all over the world.” They included some belonging to the US government. “Oh fun,” Zeiler wrote. “One is DOD Network information center.”

Liu says she heard from other employees the next day that the company had been attacked. Soon after, her complaint says, Clarifai’s general counsel, Caroline McCaffery, summoned her via Slack message to meet in a broom closet.

There, Liu says, McCaffery detailed what executives had learned about the hack and asked for help in planning internal messaging about the incident. Liu says she raised concerns that the Pentagon, and perhaps other Clarifai customers, should be informed, but that McCaffery claimed it wasn’t necessary until the internal investigation was complete.

Later that day, McCaffery announced at a company meeting that no one should write down anything about the hack, former and current employees say. In her lawsuit, Liu says she added a point to the agenda for her next scheduled meeting with her manager about reporting the hack to the government. Liu was terminated a few days later.

One former and one current Clarifai employee say the company still hadn’t disclosed the breach to the Pentagon several weeks later. A company spokesperson said customers were notified of the incident, but declined to say when. Liu’s complaint says that the Pentagon learned of the incident through other means, but she and her lawyer declined to elaborate.

Liu says she was told she was fired because her work did not align with that of Clarifai’s sales team. Her lawsuit claims the real reason was because she had urged Clarifai to inform the Pentagon of the breach. Her complaint was filed with the Department of Defense Inspector General, alleging that Clarifai broke Pentagon rules by not reporting the breach within 72 hours, and broke military law prohibiting reprisals against contractor employees trying to disclose information about breaches of department regulations. Clarifai’s spokesperson confirmed that Liu was let go in November but denied the company did anything improper.

Early this year, Clarifai’s Maven contract was extended by two months, because the Pentagon liked the company’s technology, people familiar with the work say. By that time, several employees involved had left or asked to be transferred off the project. Clarifai, which has offices in Manhattan and San Francisco, is still trying to expand its government and defense work, in part by hiring new staff closer to the Pentagon. The startup’s website lists five open engineering positions in Washington, DC.


More Great WIRED Stories

Tesla pulls plug on Home Depot solar sales four months after national kickoff

CLOSE

The new Tesla Model Y may not have a steering wheel. Buzz60

CONNECTTWEETLINKEDIN 1 COMMENTEMAILMORE

SAN FRANCISCO — The bombshell message of Elon Musk’s email to Tesla staff Tuesday was that 9% of employees would be let go as the company tightens its fiscal belt while in pursuit of boosted Model 3 sedan output.

But a few paragraphs into the CEO’s missive, which appeared on his Twitter feed, was equally big news: the company is pulling the plug on a new partnership with Home Depot aimed at growing sales of Telsa’s electric-energy collection and storage products through its recent SolarCity acquisition.

In opting not to renew a residential-sales agreement with Home Depot, Musk was ending an initiative that kicked off in February and was aimed at rebranding SolarCity solar sales as Tesla in 800 of Home Depot’s 2,200 locations.

A Home Depot spokesperson told USA TODAY that the company plans to continue to offer Tesla’s products in its stores through the end of the year, along with solar offerings from a range of other companies.

Musk said the reason for killing the deal was to “focus our efforts on selling solar power in Tesla stores and online.”

The CEO’s email noted that majority of those kiosk employees would be offered the opportunity to work in Tesla stores, where the company sells its electric cars, Powerwall electric-storage devices and its solar panels and solar tiles.

When the Home Depot partnership was announced a few months ago, it seemed like a quick way to bring to the masses Musk’s latest business vision: solar energy being collected on a roof, stored in a Powerwall and fed to the home and electric car.

Tesla’s Powerwall costs around $6,000, while its innovative glass solar-panel tiles — which costs considerably more than traditional roof-mounted solar panels — are just now starting to make their way onto rooftops.

Perhaps more than a statement about Tesla’s solar sales inside Home Depot stores, the change of plans is a reflection of the company’s increased focus on its critical entry-level electric vehicle, the Model 3.

“Like the employee reduction, the withdrawal from Home Depot is another indication that Elon is focusing on Tesla’s do-or-die task, consistently produce Model 3s at a high volume,” says Karl Brauer, executive publisher for Autotrader and Kelley Blue Book.

“This focus may come from board pressure or Elon himself, but either way it’s critically important if Tesla wants to remain a viable player in the personal transportation industry,” he says.

While the synergistic opportunities of the SolarCity deal appealed to Tesla fans, some analysts were critical of adding yet another business challenge to Musk’s plate, which already includes flying SpaceX rockets and drilling Boring Company tunnels.

Much was also made at the time of the 2016 purchase that SolarCity’s CEO was Musk’s cousin, Lyndon Rive. Musk already was one of SolarCity’s largest shareholders.

Tesla paid $2.6 billion to absorb the solar company, whose panel manufacturing plant is in New York. Tesla’s mushrooming Gigafactory in Nevada is busy producing cells for both Tesla cars and its Powerwall and Powerpack storage units.

Musk recently announced at the company’s annual shareholder meeting that a second Gigafactory would be built near Shanghai, though details about the project remain scarce.

Follow USA TODAY tech writer Marco della Cava on Twitter.

Elon Musk: Tech pioneer

Posted!

A link has been posted to your Facebook feed.

 Elon Musk CEO of SpaceX, speaks to the media during

Elon Musk CEO of SpaceX, speaks to the media during a press conference after the Falcon Heavy Launch on Feb. 6, 2018.  CRAIG BAILEY/FLORIDA TODAY VIA USA TODAY NETWORK
Tesla founder Elon Musk presenting the new Roadster

Tesla founder Elon Musk presenting the new Roadster electric sports vehicle (on background), presented to media on Nov. 16, 2017 at Tesla’s Los Angeles design center. Tesla says the Roadster will accelerate from 0-60 mph in less than two seconds. Tesla says the new Roadster will cost $200,000 and will be released in three years.  /TESLA HANDOUT VIA EPA-EFE
PayPal Chief Executive Officer Peter Thiel, left, and

PayPal Chief Executive Officer Peter Thiel, left, and founder Elon Musk, right, pose with the PayPal logo at corporate headquarters in Palo Alto, Calif., on Oct. 20, 2000. Elon Musk made his fortune off PayPal. Online auction giant eBay Inc. announced Monday, July 8, 2002, it would buy the electronic payment facilitator for more than $1.3 billion in stock.   PAUL SAKUMA/ASSOCIATED PRESS
SpaceX CEO Elon Musk congratulates teams competing

SpaceX CEO Elon Musk congratulates teams competing on the Hyperloop Pod Competition II at SpaceX’s Hyperloop track in Hawthorne, Calif on Aug. 27, 2017. A committee of the Los Angeles City Council on April 18, 2018, approved an environmental review exemption for a Los Angeles-area tunnel that Elon Musk wants to dig to test a novel underground transportation system.  DAMIAN DOVARGANES/AP
SpaceX's newest rocket, the Falcon Heavy, the most

SpaceX’s newest rocket, the Falcon Heavy, the most powerful rocket in the world, lifts off on it first demonstration flight. The rocket leapt off Pad 39A at the Kennedy Space Center in Florida at 3:45pm. on Feb. 6, 2018.  CRAIG BAILEY/FLORIDA TODAY VIA USA TODAY NETWORK
This image from video provided by SpaceX shows Elon

This image from video provided by SpaceX shows Elon Musk’s red Tesla sports car with a dummy driver named “Starman” which was launched into space during the first test flight of the Falcon Heavy rocket on Feb. 6, 2018.  /SPACEX VIA AP
The twin boosters from SpaceX's newest rocket, the

The twin boosters from SpaceX’s newest rocket, the Falcon Heavy make a successful landing at Landing Zone 1 at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station on Feb. 6, 2018.  CRAIG BAILEY/FLORIDA TODAY VIA USA TODAY NETWORK
President Trump talks with Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon

President Trump talks with Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, center, and White House chief strategist Steve Bannon during a meeting with business leaders in the State Dining Room of the White House in Washington, Feb. 3, 2017.  EVAN VUCCI/AP
Tesla Motors CEO Elon Musk speaks about the Interplanetary

Tesla Motors CEO Elon Musk speaks about the Interplanetary Transport System which aims to reach Mars with the first human crew in history, in the conference given by Tesla Motors CEO Elon Musk during the 67th International Astronautical Congress in Guadalajara, Mexico on September 27, 2016.  HECTOR-GUERRERO/AFP/GETTY IMAGES
Tesla Motors CEO Elon Musk unveils the Model X at

Tesla Motors CEO Elon Musk unveils the Model X at a launch event in Fremont, Calif on Sept. 29, 2015. The Tesla Motors X is an all-wheel drive SUV featuring a 90 kWh battery providing 250 miles of range and will be able to go from 0 to 60 mph in 3.2 seconds.   ROBERT HANASHIRO/USA TODAY
CEO and Chief Product Architect of Tesla Motors, Elon

CEO and Chief Product Architect of Tesla Motors, Elon Musk shows of his throwback t-shirt of the “Tesla” heavy metal band on January 24, 2015 in Park City, Utah.  LILY LAWRENCE/GETTY IMAGES FOR OCEANIC PRESERVATION SOCIETY
Elon Musk, Tesla CEO, discusses new technologies before

Elon Musk, Tesla CEO, discusses new technologies before an event for Tesla owners and the media held at the Hawthorne Airport. In the background is a Tesla model P85D.   ROBERT HANASHIRO/USA TODAY
SpaceX CEO Elon Musk unveils SpaceX's new seven-seat

SpaceX CEO Elon Musk unveils SpaceX’s new seven-seat Dragon V2 spacecraft, in Hawthorne, California on May 29, 2014. The private spaceflight companys new manned space capsule is designed to ferry NASA astronauts to and from the International Space Station. The capsule was named for “Puff the Magic Dragon,” a jab at those who scoffed when Musk founded the company in 2002 and set the space bar exceedingly high. SpaceX went on to become the first private company to launch a spacecraft into orbit and return it safely to Earth in 2010.   ROBYN BECK/AFP/GETTY IMAGES
Elon Musk CEO, Cofounder, Chief Product Architect for

Elon Musk CEO, Cofounder, Chief Product Architect for Tesla with a new Model S car outside the Tesla customer delivery area at the Tesla Fremont factory on June 21, 2012.  /JESSICA BRANDI LIFLAND FOR USA TODAY
Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla Motors, poses with a Tesla

Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla Motors, poses with a Tesla car in front of Nasdaq following the electric automakerís initial public offering on June, 29, 2010, in New York.  /MARK LENNIHAN, AP
Tesla Motors president and CEO Ze'ev Drori, left, and

Tesla Motors president and CEO Ze’ev Drori, left, and Tesla Motors chairman Elon Musk, right, pose in the Tesla Motors development facility in San Carlos, just south of San Francisco next to a Tesla Roadster on Feb. 19, 2008. The Tesla Roadster, a $99,000 electric sports car powered by laptop computer batteries, is 100 percent electric, can go from 0-60 mph in four seconds and the electric car gets an equivalent of 135 mpg compared to a gas powered vehicle. Production begins mid-March. The car itself is being made in England.  JACK GRUBER/USA TODAY
Elon Musk stands in front of parts of the first stage

Elon Musk stands in front of parts of the first stage of the Falcon 9 rocket at the company’s headquarters in El Segundo, Calif. on Sept. 18, 2007.   DAN MACMEDAN/USA TODAY

Like this topic? You may also like these photo galleries:

    Replay
Autoplay
Show Thumbnails
Show Captions

CONNECTTWEETLINKEDIN 1 COMMENTEMAILMORE
Read or Share this story: https://usat.ly/2Mn9B1q

Byton’s K-Byte Electric Concept Makes Self-Driving Look Good

While Tesla has spent the past six months struggling to ramp up production of the Model 3 and fielding criticism over its Autopilot tech and safety protocols, one of its most intriguing wannabe rivals, Byton, has spent the first half of 2018 positioning itself to swipe Elon Musk’selectric innovation crown.

The coup d’EV started in January at CES, with the reveal of a screen-stuffed concept SUV. In February, Byton announced a partnership with star-studded Aurora to bring self-driving smarts to its vehicles. And today, at CES Asia in Shanghai, it unveiled a second concept car, a small sedan that can’t help but make you think of a certain car rolling off the assembly line in Silicon Valley.

Byton’s new ride is the K-Byte, a three-box sedan with the front wheels pushed as far forward as possible. From the side it has the muscular look of a Dodge Charger. The rear lights wrap neatly around the trunk. Up front, things get a little more wild, with narrow slot headlights sitting atop a giant grinning grille that seems to open into a deep blackness pierced with laser lights. It’s the kind of view you’d expect from the bridge of a starship headed into warp drive.

Look a bit closer and you can spot the sensors that Byton’s engineers believe will let the K-Byte drive itself. Front- and rear-facing lidar units are built into the roof. Sensors and cameras pop out of the fender, just behind the front wheels. Byton’s designers are clearly not cool with the cobbled together look of most robo-car prototypes. “You could think about an approach where you try to hide the sensors, or use them as design elements,” says CEO Carsten Breitfeld.

Oh, and he’s pretty confident his startup can make great looking, high-quality cars. “This might sound a bit arrogant now, but we are making a claim for the design leadership in the car industry.”

Byton will sell cars to individuals, but it may also run fleet services—that’s where the Aurora partnership and nicely integrated self-driving sensors come in handy.
Byton

It may seem odd to be showcasing a second concept car before the company has started building and selling the first one, but Byton says its factory in Nanjing, China, is just starting to churn out the first prototypes of the SUV it unveiled in January (now branded the M-Byte), which it hopes to put on the market by the end of next year.

Unveiling this new sedan is supposed to prove that Byton can design and build different car bodies on its electric platform. Breitfeld says Byton will likely follow the SUV and the sedan with a seven-seater, minivan-style offering. The design is popular in its home market and could be useful in the age of autonomy as a driverless shuttle. Byton will sell cars to individuals, but it may also run fleet services—that’s where the Aurora partnership comes in handy.

Like the other Chinese automakers hoping to penetrate the American market—Faraday Future, Lucid Motors, and SF Motors—Byton hasn’t yet backed up its ambition by proving it can actually build compelling cars, let alone stick around long enough to challenge Elon Musk’s automaker. But it did just net $500 million from investors including the FAW group, a Chinese state-owned automaker, effectively giving the government a stake in its success. And if it can build an electric ride with solid range, great technology, and a design as attractive as the concepts it’s showing, it stands a good chance. Americans already buy millions of Japanese and Korean cars a year, when the price and product are right. Byton wants to bring China to the party, and maybe give Tesla a shock in the process.


More Great WIRED Stories

The AT&T-Time Warner Merger Is a Done Deal. Now What?

HBO, CNN, Warner Brothers, DC Comics, and the rest of the Time Warner empire will soon be owned by AT&T, thanks to a decision by a federal judge Tuesday to approve the telecommunications giant’s $85 billion purchase of the media conglomerate.

The Department of Justice filed suit to stop the merger last November, arguing that the merger would lead to higher television prices and fewer choices for consumers. US District Judge Richard J. Leon rejected that argument, allowing the deal to proceed without conditions.

“We look forward to closing the merger on or before June 20 so we can begin to give consumers video entertainment that is more affordable, mobile, and innovative,” AT&T General Counsel David McAtee said in a statement.

The deal will unite the nation’s second-largest mobile phone provider, third-largest home broadband provider, and second-largest pay-TV provider with a deep well of content, including Turner Broadcasting, which owns rights to basketball’s March Madness, plus NBA and major-league baseball playoffs. Opponents of the deal said it will further consolidate the nation’s telecommunications and media landscape, leading to higher prices and fewer choices for consumers.

The deal raises questions whether AT&T might reserve some of Time Warner’s content for its own services. When Comcast acquired NBC Universal in 2011, the company was subjected to a number of conditions as part of an agreement with the DOJ and the Federal Communications Commission, including a requirement that Comcast license NBC content to rivals, agree to arbitration in the event of licensing fee disagreements, and follow the principles of net neutrality.

AT&T argued that acquiring Time Warner will help it compete with streaming video companies like Netflix, Hulu, and Amazon, all of which have invested in original programming that they don’t have to license to competitors.

The decision will likely be seen as good news for other pending and potential mergers, including T-Mobile’s plan to acquire Sprint, bids by Disney and Comcast for 21st Century Fox, and Sinclair Broadcast Group‘s purchase of the Tribune Company. However, each of those cases involves companies that compete directly in so-called horizontal mergers. AT&T-Time Warner was considered a vertical merger, because the companies are in different parts of the media food chain, so the ruling may not be a reliable indicator for those deals.

Instead of imposing conditions on the AT&T-Time Warner merger, the DOJ instead tried to block the deal after AT&T reportedly rejected the idea of selling or spinning off Turner Broadcasting. The FCC declined to review the deal. Leon could have imposed conditions as part of his decision, but did not.

AT&T has long argued that the merger will be good for consumers because it will enable the company to create new video offerings. But if the Comcast/NBC merger is any indication, the deal could be a wash at best for consumers.

“This is a disappointing result, and we expect the government will appeal,” said John Bergmayer, senior counsel at the advocacy group Public Knowledge. He said the merger will lead to higher bills and fewer choice of programming, and encourage other mergers among media and telecom companies.

The deal, announced in October 2016, was controversial from the beginning. Then-candidate Donald Trump spoke out against the proposal, saying it would lead to “too much concentration of power in the hands of too few.” It was hard not to see a political motivation in the opposition, however, given the president’s well known criticism of CNN.

AT&T argued that the government’s opposition was politically motivated. That claim was given weight by the DOJ’s antitrust chief Makan Delrahim’s apparent flip-flop on the deal: Before he was nominated to the DOJ, Delrahim told the Business News Network that he saw no problem with the AT&T-Time Warner merger. Leon rejected AT&T’s efforts to argue during the trial that it was being targeted for political reasons.

At trial, the DOJ focused its case primarily on the idea that AT&T, which owns the satellite and streaming TV service DirecTV, could charge rivals more to access content from HBO or CNN, and withhold those channels, leading to “blackouts” for consumers if rivals refused to pay the higher prices. The DOJ argued that AT&T could, in theory, offset any lost revenue from withholding content by selling DirecTV service to customers in affected regions. AT&T argued that the department’s economic models were flawed. Leon ruled that the DOJ had failed to prove that the combined company would have more leverage in negotiations, and that there was insufficient evidence to suggest that AT&T would have the incentive to stop licensing Time Warner to its rivals.

The DOJ’s attempt at blocking the deal broke with decades of precedent in vertical mergers involving companies that don’t compete directly. Had Leon upheld the DOJ’s decision, it could have signalled that other big mergers would face similar trouble.


More Great WIRED Stories

In a fast about-face, Seattle caves to Amazon, overturns landmark corporate head tax

CLOSE

Here are 21 commands that even seasoned Echo users may not know. Many of them are useful, some are fun, and others give the illusion that Alexa is as cognizant as we are. Kim Komando, special for USA TODAY

CONNECTTWEETLINKEDIN 9 COMMENTEMAILMORE

SAN FRANCISCO — Just a month after Seattle passed a controversial corporate head tax aimed at Amazon and other large businesses that would have funded homeless programs, the city council voted to rescind the plan Tuesday afternoon. The about-face comes after a ferocious backlash by some of the biggest companies in town.

The vote was taken after more than two hours of heated and emotional testimony on the part of those who support the tax and those who felt it would damage the city’s businesses and scare investment away.

The city council’s shift comes as many cities, not just Seattle, struggle to deal with rising levels of income inequality, gentrification, homelessness and change wrought by an influx of large numbers of highly paid tech workers. The anger and frustration over this confluence of issues has led some to focus on large tech firms such as Amazon in Seattle or Google in Silicon Valley, as the cause.

In Seattle, a 4% rise in homelessness in the past year as rents have risen has been the flashpoint for these issues. A tally of the homeless conducted in January by the All Home coalition found 8,599 people living in the streets, in vehicles, in abandoned buildings or in tents in the city.

The Seattle city council is feeling a real sense of urgency as it relates to homelessness,” said Jeffrey Shulman, a marketing professor at the University of Washington who studies growth in Seattle. “We’ve got people dying on the streets, it’s a visible crisis affecting everyone, not just those in need.”

That helped lead to the May 14 vote by the council that unanimously passed a measure requiring companies with revenues of more than $20 million a year pay an annual $275 tax per employee. The vote came after weeks of hearings, demonstrations, heated public meetings and a threat by Amazon to stop construction of its newest Seattle tower and to pull out of leasing another.

But pushback from Amazon, Starbucks and other large firms resulted in a surprise swerve by the council on Monday, when its president, Bruce Harrell, announced he had scheduled a special meeting on Tuesday about a repeal of the tax.

The unprecedented reversal vote happened even as a campaign called No Tax on Jobs, funded by area businesses, was also preparing to submit petition signatures to qualify for a referendum on the tax for the November ballot. It had gathered more than 45,000 signatures, supporters said.

“Today’s vote by the Seattle City Council to repeal the tax on job creation is the right decision for the region’s economic prosperity,” said Amazon communications vice president Drew Hardener.

In a statement, Seattle Mayor Jenny Durkan and all but two of the City Council, said “We heard you. This week, the City Council is moving forward with the consideration of legislation to repeal the current tax on large businesses to address the homelessness crisis.”

Three of those council members were the original sponsors of the tax

“It is clear that the ordinance will lead to a prolonged, expensive political fight over the next five months that will do nothing to tackle our urgent housing and homelessness crisis,” the statement said.

But council member Lisa Herbold, another of the original sponsors, countered that turnabout was the result of a ploy to convince Seattleites that the “increased levels of human suffering we see in our city is caused by government inefficiency rather than by the Gilded Age level income inequality.”

City constraints

Washington state, and by extension Seattle, faces an especially difficult situation when it comes to funding constraints. It is one of the few states in the nation with no income tax, which is illegal under state law. Instead it must rely on property taxes, which can only be raised so high, said Tom Cooke, a professor at Georgetown University’s McDonough School of Business.

A tax on how many employees a corporation has, based on its revenue, is one way for elected officials to create a source of revenue that doesn’t directly affect individual voters.

“That’s historically how we’ve build football and baseball stadiums, by taxing things like hotels and rental cars because it doesn’t affect the individual voter,” said Cooke.

However Seattle quickly realized that the proposed tax, which would have gone into effect in January, could also potentially affect how many employees companies might hire and even if they would stay in town. Construction workers, among others, marched and rallied against the tax. Amazon, in particular, has been on a building spree in the city.

In the end, “the whole thing unfolded in a really bad way. I don’t think anyone has come out of this looking good,” said Shulman.

Still, he’s hopeful that this could be a refresh, signaling a more collaborative approach to address this crisis rather than a demonization of business

“Businesses need to address the homeless challenge,” he said. “I’ve talked to many Amazon employees and it’s just a drain on morale.”

Rising rents the problem

The homeless problem in Seattle and the county it sits in, King County, is largely the result of rising rent costs, even as poverty levels have fallen, according to a report released in May by the consulting firm McKinsey that was commissioned by the Seattle Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce.

At the same time, homeless housing and crisis response systems in the county have improved in performance and efficiency and have functioned well.

The problem is that the shortage of affordable housing options continues to increase, making fewer units available to households earning below 50% of the median area income. In 2011, 35% of county rental units would have been affordable to those residents. In 2017 it was just 18%, the McKinsey study found.

Those numbers show that what the county needs is investment in affordable housing, and given the tax constraints created by state law, there are not many ways to do that, said Alison Eisinger, executive director of the Seattle/King County Coalition on Homelessness.

The corporate head tax was identified as one of the few new potential sources of revenue available by a task force the Seattle City Council created during the budget process last year, she said.

“The right-wing messages that are being trumpeted — that government doesn’t know what to do and can’t be trusted to solve the issues — are false. We have seen very strong results from the things we’re doing,” she said.

She said those fighting to help end homelessness is in no way opposed to businesses profiting from their work.

“We welcome business and jobs. We are interested in corporate reasonability. And what that means is you reinvest in the infrastructure of the community that has welcomed you,” she said.

CONNECTTWEETLINKEDIN 9 COMMENTEMAILMORE
Read or Share this story: https://usat.ly/2MmADWr

What Facebook told Congress: It even knows when you need to charge your phone

CONNECTTWEETLINKEDIN 4 COMMENTEMAILMORE

SAN FRANCISCO — Facebook tracks when you need to recharge your phone and even knows when you’re looking at the Facebook page on your computer screen. And it’s OK with being regulated, as long as it gets to help write those regulations.

These were some of the disclosures made by the world’s largest social network late Monday when the Senate released 454 pages of answers from the Menlo Park, California-based company.

CEO Mark Zuckerberg had repeatedly promised lawmakers his staff would follow up on questions about Facebook’s approach to privacy during two days of grueling congressional hearings in April. Senators had also sent 2,000 questions in advance of those hearings, which followed outrage over revelations Facebook knew Cambridge Analytica had bought personal data on 87 million users, without the users’ consent, for political ad targeting during the 2016 presidential election.

Altogether, the file of answers provided the public with details on some lesser-known ways Facebook has devised to track its 2.2 billion users but left many broader questions unanswered.

More: Russian Facebook ads inflamed Hispanic tensions over immigration after Trump election

More: After Facebook hearings, users want to know: who is protecting my data?

More: Facebook denies abuse of user privacy after report it shared info without consent

For instance, Facebook revealed that it collects data — a lot of data — about the various devices people use to log into Facebook, such as computers, their smartphones and their tablets. Facebook also collects information such as the device’s battery level, how much available storage they have and the strength of the Wi-Fi signal the machine is receiving.

The company also knows whether you’re actually looking at your Facebook window or if you’ve just got it open as one of many tabs. In some cases, Facebook can also gather information about nearby devices or other devices on the user’s network.

The Cambridge Analytica data revelations, on the heels of the company’s belated acknowledgement that a Russian disinformation operation had scammed its users with millions of fake posts designed to sway their voting, turned into a public relations crisis for the high-flying company. Celebrity users vowed to delete their Facebook, lawmakers threatened regulations and Zuckerberg agreed for the first time to testify before Congress.

More: Mark Zuckerberg pledges Facebook will put ‘people first,’ avoid past mistakes

More: Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak says he’s left Facebook over data collection

The hearings also gave a platform for lawmakers to air some longstanding complaints — such as allegations Facebook’s news feed is biased against conservatives.

As one of his 114 questions, Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, posed a series of detailed queries about what types of speech Facebook might define as hate speech and therefore censor, including statements such as “Islam is a religion of peace” and “Islam is a religion of war,” as well as “All white people are inherently racist” and “All black people are inherently racist.”

In its answer, Facebook said it would define hate speech as something that was violent or dehumanizing, statements of inferiority and calls for exclusion or segregation. It did not answer Cruz’s specific questions about the 27 statements listed in his question.

Cruz also asked what percentage of the moderators Facebook uses to check posted content were registered as Republicans or Democrats or had donated, volunteered for, interned with or run for office in either party.

Facebook responded, “We do not maintain statistics on these data points.”

Last month, Facebook said it would bring in advisers to investigate whether it suppresses conservative voices, part of a post-Cambridge Analytica campaign to rebuild trust with users.

In the answers, the company also detailed ways its partners were able to gather information about users’ activities even if they’re not logged into Facebook, including information about the purchases they make and the games they play. Questions about how Facebook tracks nonusers during the hearing had illuminated the social network’s digital reach, which many users had either ignored or taken for granted.

Despite the length of the responses, many did not actually answer the questions asked. For example, the Committee said it “had become aware that Facebook has surveyed users about whether they trust the company to safeguard their privacy” and asked that Zuckerberg provide the results of any such survey.

But in a 326-word reply, Facebook did not say whether it surveyed its users or what it found if it did, instead reiterating, “Privacy is at the core of everything we do. And our approach to privacy starts with our commitment to transparency and control.”

Lawmakers have continued to raise the specter of regulation after reports that followed the hearings on Facebook’s data-sharing deals with device makers and other companies. The company says it’s open to privacy regulation — as long as it was “the right regulation.” In its answer to Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., the company offered to write such laws itself.

The two separate documents, a 225-page set of answers to the Senate Judiciary Committee and a 229-page set of answers to the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, were posted late Monday.

CONNECTTWEETLINKEDIN 4 COMMENTEMAILMORE
Read or Share this story: https://usat.ly/2t0px0J

Tesla cutting 9% of workforce and Home Depot deal, CEO Elon Musk says

CLOSE

It’s also ending its partnership with Home Depot. Time

CONNECTTWEETLINKEDIN 4 COMMENTEMAILMORE

Tesla said Tuesday that it will cut thousands of jobs, aiming to improve its finances amid a period of torrential losses as it accelerates production of its newest electric vehicle.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk confirmed the company is shedding about 9 percent of its workforce — “almost entirely” salaried employees but not production-line workers, according to an internal email he posted to Twitter.

The company had 37,543 full-time employees as of Dec. 31, according to a public filing. At that level, 9 percent would equal nearly 3,400 jobs.

The company, based in Palo Alto, California, also plans to end its deal to sell solar panels at home improvement chain Home Depot. Instead, Tesla will focus on selling solar power through its own stores.

The moves come as Musk is facing pressure to ramp up output of the new Model 3 electric sedan and show bottom-line profitability.

Musk said the cuts would not affect the company’s ability to speed up production.

Elon Musk: Tech pioneer

Posted!

A link has been posted to your Facebook feed.

 Elon Musk CEO of SpaceX, speaks to the media during

Elon Musk CEO of SpaceX, speaks to the media during a press conference after the Falcon Heavy Launch on Feb. 6, 2018.  CRAIG BAILEY/FLORIDA TODAY VIA USA TODAY NETWORK
Tesla founder Elon Musk presenting the new Roadster

Tesla founder Elon Musk presenting the new Roadster electric sports vehicle (on background), presented to media on Nov. 16, 2017 at Tesla’s Los Angeles design center. Tesla says the Roadster will accelerate from 0-60 mph in less than two seconds. Tesla says the new Roadster will cost $200,000 and will be released in three years.  /TESLA HANDOUT VIA EPA-EFE
PayPal Chief Executive Officer Peter Thiel, left, and

PayPal Chief Executive Officer Peter Thiel, left, and founder Elon Musk, right, pose with the PayPal logo at corporate headquarters in Palo Alto, Calif., on Oct. 20, 2000. Elon Musk made his fortune off PayPal. Online auction giant eBay Inc. announced Monday, July 8, 2002, it would buy the electronic payment facilitator for more than $1.3 billion in stock.   PAUL SAKUMA/ASSOCIATED PRESS
SpaceX CEO Elon Musk congratulates teams competing

SpaceX CEO Elon Musk congratulates teams competing on the Hyperloop Pod Competition II at SpaceX’s Hyperloop track in Hawthorne, Calif on Aug. 27, 2017. A committee of the Los Angeles City Council on April 18, 2018, approved an environmental review exemption for a Los Angeles-area tunnel that Elon Musk wants to dig to test a novel underground transportation system.  DAMIAN DOVARGANES/AP
SpaceX's newest rocket, the Falcon Heavy, the most

SpaceX’s newest rocket, the Falcon Heavy, the most powerful rocket in the world, lifts off on it first demonstration flight. The rocket leapt off Pad 39A at the Kennedy Space Center in Florida at 3:45pm. on Feb. 6, 2018.  CRAIG BAILEY/FLORIDA TODAY VIA USA TODAY NETWORK
This image from video provided by SpaceX shows Elon

This image from video provided by SpaceX shows Elon Musk’s red Tesla sports car with a dummy driver named “Starman” which was launched into space during the first test flight of the Falcon Heavy rocket on Feb. 6, 2018.  /SPACEX VIA AP
The twin boosters from SpaceX's newest rocket, the

The twin boosters from SpaceX’s newest rocket, the Falcon Heavy make a successful landing at Landing Zone 1 at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station on Feb. 6, 2018.  CRAIG BAILEY/FLORIDA TODAY VIA USA TODAY NETWORK
President Trump talks with Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon

President Trump talks with Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, center, and White House chief strategist Steve Bannon during a meeting with business leaders in the State Dining Room of the White House in Washington, Feb. 3, 2017.  EVAN VUCCI/AP
Tesla Motors CEO Elon Musk speaks about the Interplanetary

Tesla Motors CEO Elon Musk speaks about the Interplanetary Transport System which aims to reach Mars with the first human crew in history, in the conference given by Tesla Motors CEO Elon Musk during the 67th International Astronautical Congress in Guadalajara, Mexico on September 27, 2016.  HECTOR-GUERRERO/AFP/GETTY IMAGES
Tesla Motors CEO Elon Musk unveils the Model X at

Tesla Motors CEO Elon Musk unveils the Model X at a launch event in Fremont, Calif on Sept. 29, 2015. The Tesla Motors X is an all-wheel drive SUV featuring a 90 kWh battery providing 250 miles of range and will be able to go from 0 to 60 mph in 3.2 seconds.   ROBERT HANASHIRO/USA TODAY
CEO and Chief Product Architect of Tesla Motors, Elon

CEO and Chief Product Architect of Tesla Motors, Elon Musk shows of his throwback t-shirt of the “Tesla” heavy metal band on January 24, 2015 in Park City, Utah.  LILY LAWRENCE/GETTY IMAGES FOR OCEANIC PRESERVATION SOCIETY
Elon Musk, Tesla CEO, discusses new technologies before

Elon Musk, Tesla CEO, discusses new technologies before an event for Tesla owners and the media held at the Hawthorne Airport. In the background is a Tesla model P85D.   ROBERT HANASHIRO/USA TODAY
SpaceX CEO Elon Musk unveils SpaceX's new seven-seat

SpaceX CEO Elon Musk unveils SpaceX’s new seven-seat Dragon V2 spacecraft, in Hawthorne, California on May 29, 2014. The private spaceflight companys new manned space capsule is designed to ferry NASA astronauts to and from the International Space Station. The capsule was named for “Puff the Magic Dragon,” a jab at those who scoffed when Musk founded the company in 2002 and set the space bar exceedingly high. SpaceX went on to become the first private company to launch a spacecraft into orbit and return it safely to Earth in 2010.   ROBYN BECK/AFP/GETTY IMAGES
Elon Musk CEO, Cofounder, Chief Product Architect for

Elon Musk CEO, Cofounder, Chief Product Architect for Tesla with a new Model S car outside the Tesla customer delivery area at the Tesla Fremont factory on June 21, 2012.  /JESSICA BRANDI LIFLAND FOR USA TODAY
Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla Motors, poses with a Tesla

Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla Motors, poses with a Tesla car in front of Nasdaq following the electric automakerís initial public offering on June, 29, 2010, in New York.  /MARK LENNIHAN, AP
Tesla Motors president and CEO Ze'ev Drori, left, and

Tesla Motors president and CEO Ze’ev Drori, left, and Tesla Motors chairman Elon Musk, right, pose in the Tesla Motors development facility in San Carlos, just south of San Francisco next to a Tesla Roadster on Feb. 19, 2008. The Tesla Roadster, a $99,000 electric sports car powered by laptop computer batteries, is 100 percent electric, can go from 0-60 mph in four seconds and the electric car gets an equivalent of 135 mpg compared to a gas powered vehicle. Production begins mid-March. The car itself is being made in England.  JACK GRUBER/USA TODAY
Elon Musk stands in front of parts of the first stage

Elon Musk stands in front of parts of the first stage of the Falcon 9 rocket at the company’s headquarters in El Segundo, Calif. on Sept. 18, 2007.   DAN MACMEDAN/USA TODAY

Like this topic? You may also like these photo galleries:

    Replay
Autoplay
Show Thumbnails
Show Captions

More: Tesla shares fall despite better-than-expected earnings loss

More: Elon Musk says Tesla will soon open body shops and a Shanghai factory, but not motorcycles

More: Tesla Model X driver killed in California crash wasn’t holding steering wheel, NTSB says

More: Elon Musk’s style and Tesla’s Model 3 mission could be on a ‘collision course’

“Tesla has grown and evolved rapidly over the last several years, which has resulted in some duplication of roles and some job functions that, while they made sense in the past, are difficult to justify today,” he told workers in the email.

Tesla representatives were not immediately available for further comment.

“The pressure is on for Tesla to cut the red ink as the third quarter approaches,” AutoPacific analyst Dave Sullivan said. “Cutting your way to profitability as you try to grow and launch vehicles is very difficult. It’s hard to believe Tesla had enough fat to trim in their salaried ranks. I expect Musk to push and pull more levers in the next few months as the push for profits continues.”

CLOSE

Tesla reported its worst-ever quarterly loss and said its Model 3 production target remains on track. Aleksandra Michalska reports. Newslook

Musk said the cuts won’t slow the rate of production, which is happening at Tesla’s assembly plant in California and its battery factory in Nevada. Delays at each operation have prevented the company from rapidly fulfilling paid customer reservations for the Model 3.

“It’s notable that they left the production teams alone because it’s vital that they get the Model 3 production rolling,” Autotrader analyst Michelle Krebs said.

Musk said June 5 that it’s “quite likely” the company will reach its goal of making 5,000 Model 3 cars a week by the end of the month.

Since then, Tesla shares have gained nearly 18%, closing Tuesday at $342.77. The historically volatile stock had been in a slump since late March, when it briefly dipped below $250 as investors grew concerned about Model 3 production delays, Tesla spending and safety investigations.

The automaker has lost more than $1.7 billion over its last four complete quarters, raising the financial stakes for the compact car.

“What drives us is our mission to accelerate the world’s transition to sustainable, clean energy, but we will never achieve that mission unless we eventually demonstrate that we can be sustainably profitable,” Musk said in the email. “That is a valid and fair criticism of Tesla’s history to date.”

Tesla’s growth has made the company the pre-eminent maker of electric vehicles. But it has come at a steep cost.

Musk has admitted several mistakes with Tesla, including too much automation on the production line and an “out of control” network of third-party contractors.

“So we’re going to scrub the barnacles on that front. It’s pretty crazy,” Musk said on a conference call in May. “You’ve got barnacles on barnacles. So there’s going to be a lot of barnacle removal.”

Musk has also lashed out against the media in recent weeks, criticizing many reporters as unethical and blasting what he perceives as unfair scrutiny of Tesla’s partially self-driving vehicle technology.

The Home Depot agreement that’s ending involved sales of Tesla solar-energy products at about 800 stores. Tesla employees based at those locations will be removed.

“Our relationship with Tesla will continue through the end of the year, but this change doesn’t affect our plans to continue offering solar options to our customers,” Home Depot spokesman Stephen Holmes said.

Follow USA TODAY reporter Nathan Bomey on Twitter @NathanBomey.

CONNECTTWEETLINKEDIN 4 COMMENTEMAILMORE
Read or Share this story: https://usat.ly/2sYmoy8

Feds Bust Dozens of Nigerian Email Scammers, but Your Inbox Still Isn’t Safe

Your email spam filter works overtime to keep sketchy investing opportunities and cheap Viagra offers out of your inbox, but you’ve probably seen some scams sneak through. That’s because email fraud operations are a multibillion-dollar business, often run by Nigerian-based syndicates that have members—not to mention targets—around the world. And on Monday, US officials announced a massive international initiative, Operation Wire Wire, that resulted in the arrest of 74 alleged email fraudsters.

The move is significant given that email scamming has gone mostly unchecked for years, but Operation Wire Wire still represents a small drop in a massive ocean of fraud. And while it particularly targets some of the money mules who underpin criminal payouts, the overall infrastructure behind these spamming campaigns is massive and inveterate. It would take major disruption to see a noticeable improvement.

Nigerian email rackets predictably target individuals, especially vulnerable populations like the elderly, but they also increasingly generate cash from a type of fraud called business email compromise, which fleeces companies of all sizes. BEC scams focus on employees with financial authority, and position fraudsters as company executives or third-party vendors that a business works with or could conceivably contract with. Employees complete a bill or invoice payment like normal, but the money really goes to scammers.

The Department of Justice—working with the Department of Homeland Security, Department of the Treasury, and Postal Inspection Service—arrested 42 people in the US, 29 in Nigeria, and three in Canada, Mauritius, and Poland who are allegedly connected to spamming operations and particularly money muling.

“Fraudsters can rob people of their life’s savings in a matter of minutes,” Attorney General Jeff Sessions said in a statement. “The Department of Justice has taken aggressive action against fraudsters in recent months…[and] we will continue to go on offense against fraudsters so that the American people can have safety and peace of mind.”

The initiative comes at an important time, as email fraud continues to grow and evolve. The email security firm Agari found last month that 24 percent of email scams now focus on BEC, and 96 percent of businesses end up being targeted by one scam or another. And fraudsters attempt to trick targets into making sizable payments, with requests averaging $35,500, Agari found. The federal Internet Crime Complaint Center reports that in recent years BEC losses in the US have totaled over $3.7 billion. Operation Wire Wire seized an impressive $2.4 million in stolen funds, and recovered $14.4 million more from wire transfers, but the scale of the problem overall is much larger.

“I applaud any and all action against these guys,” says Adam Meyers, vice president of intelligence at the security firm Crowdstrike, which has tracked Nigerian email scammers and business email compromise for years. “That said, 2.4 million dollars seized is a drop in the bucket.” Meyers also notes that money mules are relatively low on the criminal totem pole. “The key is to keep the pressure on and continuously arrest these actors at every opportunity,” he says.

‘It might be a slower start, but once the dominoes start falling you’re going to notice a more significant impact.’

James Bettke, Secureworks

There are growing signs that law enforcement agrees with this strategy. Operation Wire Wire represents increased international collaboration, and its 29 arrests in Nigeria by the country’s Economic and Financial Crimes Commission is an important step. A longtime hurdle to addressing BEC and Nigerian email scams in general has been jurisdictional and international law issues that limit access to Nigerian perpetrators. And the DOJ says it worked with law enforcement agencies in Poland, Canada, Mauritius, Indonesia, and Malaysia as well to carry out Operation Wire Wire. Scammers “are often members of transnational criminal organizations, which originated in Nigeria but have spread throughout the world,” the DOJ explains.

“The FBI is taking this very seriously. I’m aware of future endeavors that are in the works,” says James Bettke, a counterthreat unit researcher at Secureworks, a security firm that has tracked Nigerian email scammers for years. “There were no repercussions before. Scammers would just keep stealing and stealing, because they thought they were untouchable. Now that these arrests are happening they might have second thoughts.”

If the DOJ is in fact building out its investigation to eventually take down more crucial players, businesses and individual email users could eventually see a real improvement in their safety online. For now, though, Operation Wire Wire probably won’t result in a noticeable difference in your inbox.

“It might be a slower start, but once the dominoes start falling you’re going to notice a more significant impact,” Bettke says. “All of these underground economies are so interlinked that once you get through one you can really start mapping everything else out. You can start pivoting from person to person and work your way up fairly quickly.”

That provides small consolation to victims who have already lost thousands or millions of dollars in email scams. But a small step toward solving the problem is better than than none at all.


More Great WIRED Stories

These stain removal tips will change your life

Stains are the scourge of our clothes’ existence. They’re inevitable, they’re ugly, and they can ruin our favorite things. It hurts to have to spend money to replace a closet staple—if it’s even possible. So, if you spot a stain, don’t worry. We’re here to help you remove it.

Stain removal basics

Obviously, different kinds of stains need to be treated differently, and we’ll explain that in a moment. But when it comes to stains, there are three basic rules:

1. Act quickly.

The sooner you can begin treating a stain, the better your chances of removing it. If it’s a solid stain, scrape it ever so carefully with a butter knife or spoon. If the stain is liquid, blot it, and starting from the edge, work toward the middle. This will not remove the stain, but may prevent it from getting larger.

2. Avoid heat from the dryer.

Heat can cause a stain to “set”, so that it becomes a permanent part of the fiber. If you find a stain on a piece of clothing as you unload it from the washer, resist the temptation to toss it in the dryer. Your best chance of taking out the stain is to retreat it, and launder again. Since it may be hard to see a stain when the garment is wet, don’t even think of putting in the dryer until you’re certain it’s gone.

3. Be gentle on the spot.

Don’t scrub vigorously. Patting the appropriate solvent into the stain will be more effective. Don’t be rough—be patient.

Pretreating

Before you toss the clothes in the washing machine, you have to treat the stain. Here are some suggestions.

  • White shirts and socks with or without stains that come from the human body

    Pretreat with a whites/color brightener.

  • Sweat stains and bad smells

    Pretreat with an odor fighter.

  • Oil-based food stains

    Pretreat with a detergent with OXI cleaner.

  • Mystery stains

    Pretreat with a stain releaser, and wash in cold water. Clue: Hold the garment up to the light. If the stain is translucent, it’s probably grease, and you can treat it as such.

Removing stains

Nobody knows stains like a detergent company, so we talked to the biggest one: Proctor & Gamble. They sent us a gigantic 11-page chart packed with info. So, we boiled it down to a compact version for your reading convenience, and a larger version you can print and hang up in your laundry room. (Hey, you with the clumsy hands! You may want to bookmark this page.)

Find the stain type in the chart, pretreat, and soak. Then, wash the clothes at the temperature it says on the label, and rinse at the recommended temperature.

Stain-guide

Credit: Reviewed / David Kender

Larger version here for printing.

When you’re working on a stain, make sure you turn the garment inside out and lay it down on an old towel. Flipping the fabric will help get the stain out, not push it further into the fibers. The towel will to give the stain something to soak into, someplace other than your clothes.

Now that you know how to get it done, good luck removing the stains from your clothes. You’ll not only be prolonging their lives, but you’ll also feel better about wearing them when they’re no longer covered with spots.

Biggest Surprises (and Missed Opportunities) of the E3 Press Conferences

It’s Tuesday, which means the E3 show floor is now open. It also means we’re finally at the end of a four-day slog of press conferences from some of the gaming world’s largest publishers. While Activision Blizzard still doesn’t do its own pre-E3 event, just about everyone else does, which means these 96 hours have been a deluge of announcements and reveals that we did our best to get our arms around. We didn’t even cover them all: the Square Enix press conference was basically devoid of new information, and the PC Gaming Show, while compelling, was mostly a long list of indie game announcements—some of which we’ll be getting to later this week.

So, for now, here’s everything you need to know about every press conference you need to know about. Get through this, and you’ll be ready for all the other E3 news that starts….well, now.

Electronic Arts

E3 kicked things off on Saturday (yes, Saturday) with a quiet, largely uneventful press conference from Electronic Arts, broadcasted from their annual EA Play event at the Hollywood Palladium. The presser opened with Battlefield V, set during World War II, which will have heavily destructible environments and a Battle Royale Mode a la Fortnite. Respawn Entertainment gave up some details about their in-progress Star Wars game—more on that shortly—and a bit of an update on the ongoing service for Star Wars: Battlefront II.

In new games, EA revealed Unravel 2, a follow-up to its game about a precocious, cuddly little yarn man (this time, he has a friend!) and Sea of Solitude, a compellingly brooding small game introduced by a compellingly earnest German developer. The publisher also took the wraps announced a mobile Command & Conquer game and gave a lengthy demo of Anthem, BioWare’s upcoming shared-world mech game that seems to be aiming to be a Destiny killer. Even better, Anthem now has a date: February, 22, 2019. (Also FIFA was there, because FIFA is always there.)

Biggest Surprise: We got a name for Respawn’s new Star Wars game: Jedi: Fallen Order. Respawn has made great first-person shooters with the Titanfall series, so it’ll be interesting to see what they can do with the Star Wars license.

Biggest Missed Opportunity:Jedi: Fallen Order was announced sans logo or even concept trailer, which felt like a letdown. It’s hard to get excited about a name, even when it’s a good name.

Microsoft

Microsoft’s last couple of Xbox press conferences haven’t exactly succeeded at articulating the future of the Xbox—even if that future is unexpectedly bright. This year, then, was a pleasant surprise: Microsoft brought a lot of material, and a lot of surprises.

First, the publisher has quietly been getting very acquisition-happy, and is hoping to bolster its first-party games with a slew of studios that they now own. These include Ninja Theory, who made last year’s Hellblade: Senua’s Sacrifice, Undead Labs (State of Decay), Playground Games (Forza Horizon), and Compulsion Games (We Happy Few). It’s hard to say whether or not acquisitions like this are good for studios; creators get a payday, but history is riddled with instances of big publishers buying small studios and slowly running them into the ground. Time will tell whether or not this is good for gaming, but it’s certainly a good move for Microsoft.

Then, there were games. A lot of games. There’s Sekiro: Shadows Die Twice, a game about ninjas from the developers of Dark Souls, coming in 2019. Forza Horizon 4, a new installment that takes the racing franchise to Britain. The Division 2, which brings the shared world shooter to Washington, DC. Devil May Cry 5, with the franchise’s original creator back at the helm. Dying Light 2, a sequel to my favorite zombie parkour game. Gears of War 5, a Gears of War tactics game, and a Gears of War themed, uh, Funko Pop game. And Halo: Infinite, a new installment in the Halo franchise that we know just about nothing about. Also, fans got a new trailer for Kingdom Hearts 3, which is officially coming out January 25, 2019.

Biggest Surprise:Halo: Infinite could be a big deal, as could the expanded effort into Microsoft Game Pass, a subscription service that gives subscribers the Netflix-like ability to download and play a swath of the Xbox library for a flat monthly fee. But after Microsoft made so much noise about the PC at last year’s press conference, this year’s relative silence spoke volumes.

Biggest Missed Opportunity: Offering just about no details on a new Halo title made the announcement fall pretty flat.

Bethesda

The Bethesda E3 Showcase was huge this year. We got a closer look at Rage 2, a massive open-world shooter co-developed by id Software and Avalanche Studios, complete (?) with an on-stage appearance by Andrew WK. A short trailer played for Doom Eternal a sequel to the excellent Doom 2016 reboot; just like the old-school Doom 2, Eternal is apparently set on Earth. QuakeCon in August should provide many more details in that realm.

There will also be a new Wolfenstein game next year, set in an alternate-universe 1980s and starring the twin daughters of Nazi-murder-machine BJ Blaskowicz. And then there’s the big stuff: a lengthy look at Fallout 76, an impressive-looking, fully online, open-world Fallout game coming November 14; Elder Scrolls Blades, a mobile phone game that strives to be a fully featured, complete Elder Scrolls experience; and two projects much farther out on the development pipeline, sci-fi title Starfield and Elder Scrolls VI. Both are unlikely to show up on the current generation of consoles.

Biggest Surprise: Any glimpse at Elder Scrolls VI is a bit of a surprise, actually. As was the jokey-but-maybe-real Announcement of Skyrim: Very Special Edition for the Alexa.

Biggest Missed Opportunity: Andrew WK, whose presence seemed to confuse and even tranquilize the crowd. (To be fair, this is mostly a missed opportunity for Andrew WK.)

Ubisoft

Ubisoft’s presser opted for meatiness, giving fans a long look at Beyond Good and Evil 2, which looks to be a huge earthy space opera, though detail are scarce about gameplay or release. As Microsoft also revealed, The Division 2 will be set in Washington, DC, and will feature raids and free DLC as it tries its hardest to become the Tom Clancy-verse Destiny-killer it aspires to be.

New properties showed up as well. There was a lot of Skull & Bones, a gritty pirate adventure in a shared online world, and Starlink: Battle for Atlas, a sci-fi toys-to-life game (think Skylanders) bringing its dogfight-heavy combat to the Nintendo Switch—and featuring Fox from Star Fox. Finally, there was a big look at Assassin’s Creed Odyssey, which takes place in Ancient Greece and lets the player choose between two characters. Also, you can talk to Socrates, so … there’s that. Odyssey comes out October 5.

Biggest Surprise: Unlike the past couple of years, Aisha Tyler didn’t host. Aisha! Where’d you go? (Probably one of your gazillion jobs.)

Biggest Missed Opportunity: Despite teasing it with recent DLC for Ghost Recon: Wildlands, Ubisoft did not announce a new entry in the Splinter Cell stealth game franchise. Color me disappointed.

Sony

Sony’s Monday-night press conference this year was a bit odd. It started in a small “church” set, which ended up being a recreation of a location from The Last of Us, Part II, which was also the first game shown of the night. The showcase focused on lengthy demos for a handful of major Sony titles: The Last of Us; Ghost of Tsushima, a samurai game developed by Sucker Punch, which looks like a Kurosawa fan’s dream game; Death Stranding, Hideo Kojima’s surrealist eco-pocalypse starring mo-capped digital versions of Norman Reedus and Mads Mikkelsen along with what was, frankly, a weird number of babies; and Insomniac Games’ Spider-Man, which is looking like quite a romp.

Between each of these big showcases, we got canned commentary along with other announcements: A Resident Evil 2 full HD remake, coming next January 22; va sequel to the samurai Souls-like Nioh 2 developed by Team Ninja; and Control, a fascinating-looking game from Remedy Entertainment (Alan Wake) about the director of a supernatural agency. There was also another Kingdom Hearts 3 trailer, showcasing a Pirates of the Carribean world, which brought the week’s KH3 trailer total to three (so far).

Biggest Surprise: The footage of The Last of Us, Part II, along with being just as dizzyingly hyperviolent as its predecessor, featured what might be the first and only lesbian kiss ever featured on an E3 stage. The presentation of queerness in a game by a company like Sony isn’t without reproach by any means, but that’s honestly still pretty cool.

Biggest Missed Opportunity: Fair warning: I’m not going to stop hollering about Bloodborne 2 until they release Bloodborne 2.

Nintendo

Nintendo’s press conference somehow felt both huge and underwhelming. First, we got some new announcements, in the form of Daemon x Machina, a neat-looking mech action game, coming in 2019; some DLC for Xenoblade Chronicles 2; a new snazzy-looking Fire Emblem; and Super Mario Party, which will include the novel feature of linking together two Switch consoles to make one big board-game simulation. Next: that game you like is coming back in style! Yes, it was the Nintendo Switch port montage, featuring a ton of games, like Dragon Ball FighterZ, Hollow Knight, Wasteland 2, and the JRPG classic The World Ends With You (which we’d heard about but was still nice to see).

The rest of the show was devoted to one title, and one title only: Super Smash Bros. Ultimate, which arrives for the Nintendo Switch December 7. They ran down the characters (all of them, from every Smash Bros game ever, are here), and went over a long list of very detailed changes that are sure to delight hardcore fans but might have been a bit dull to everyone else. And that was, uh, it.

Biggest Surprise: Ridley, the giant dragon alien baddie from Metroid, is coming to Smash Bros, which seems like a logistical nightmare for the developers.

Biggest Missed Opportunity: Nintendo completely failed to mention Metroid Prime 4, which the company had announced last year, or their online service, which is supposedly still slated for this fall and yet is still a huge unknown.


More Great WIRED Stories

The 16 most popular board games of 2018

— Our editors review and recommend products to help you buy the stuff you need. If you make a purchase by clicking one of our links, we may earn a small share of the revenue. However, our picks and opinions are independent from USA TODAY’s newsroom and any business incentives.

Board games are an underrated adult activity, in my humble opinion.

They’re perfect for those nights when you don’t feel like going out, yet don’t want to sit mindlessly in front of the television either. Board games are an ideal combination of fun and competitive, not to mention that there are lots of unique, addicting new games that come out every year.

So yeah, I’m really into board games, and I think you will be too if you give them a chance.

If you’re looking for a board game that will get you jazzed to play, check out these 16 popular options, including some of my personal favorites. There’s something here for everyone, no matter your age!

1. A best-selling spy-themed word game

Codenames is a top-selling game on Amazon, boasting close to 2,000 reviews and an average rating of 4.8 stars. While the premise of the game may seem simple, reviewers say it can be quite challenging!

To play, you break up into two teams, each with a “spymaster” who gives one-word clues to help their teammates guess the identity of your team’s “agents.” Overall, it’s an awesome party game that’s incredibly addicting.

Get Codenames on Amazon for $16.59

2. An addicting game to bring out your competitive side

Catan is a favorite among my friends—we frequently hold “Catan nights” that inevitably get really competitive.

This popular board game has a unique design made up of 19 hexagonal “terrain” pieces, so the board is different every time you play. The object of the game is to build settlements around the island of Catan, earning “victory points” as you go, and there’s a surprising amount of strategy and alliance-making involved.

Get Catan on Amazon for $36.39

3. A silly fishing game for children

Young children love playing Let’s Go Fishin’, a simple fishing game designed for kids 3 and up. The cute multicolored fish on the board open and close their mouths, all while the base spins. The object of the game is to simply catch as many fish as you can with your rod, and whoever catches the most wins!

Get Let’s Go Fishin’ on Amazon for $6.69

4. A Harry Potter-themed edition of a classic game

You probably know Clue—where Professor Plum committed the crime in the library with the candlestick. However, this special edition of the classic game brings a magical twist to the gameplay as you work to figure out who made a Hogwarts student disappear and what spell they used. Harry Potter lovers will definitely appreciate this fun board game!

Get USAopoly Clue Harry Potter Board Game on Amazon for $36.50

5. A whimsical kids’ classic

It’s been around for decades, but Candy Land is still one of the top-selling board games on Amazon. This family-favorite is best for kids ages 3 and up—they’ll love all the colorful characters and sweet illustrations as they navigate around the board.

Get Hasbro Candy Land on Amazon for $12.99

6. A card-based strategy game with a cult following

Here’s another game that people are low-key obsessed with—Sequence has more than 2,000 reviews and an average rating of 4.8 stars.

The premise of the game is simple: Place five tokens in a row on the game board by playing cards from your hand. However, there’s a lot of strategy involved, and reviewers can’t get enough of this challenging board game!

Get Sequence on Amazon for $17.99

7. A fun game to test your bluffing skills

If you want to figure out who among your friends is a good liar, you should definitely play Chameleon. During gameplay, everyone knows the secret word—except for one person, who is the chameleon!

The object is to flush out the chameleon, but if they’re good at bluffing, you might not catch them. People say this game is surprisingly addicting and great for groups.

Get The Chameleon Board Game from Target for $19.99

8. A unique twist on Scrabble

If you love Scrabble, you’ll definitely enjoy Qwirkle—a family-friendly matching game! Players draw six blocks, each with a colored shape on it, and then take turns putting down rows of blocks that have something in common. As gameplay continues, you build a Scrabble-like grid, trying to rack up the most points.

Get the Qwirkle Board Game on Amazon for $21.84

9. A race to build an ancient civilization

The instructions may seem overwhelming at first, but once you get the hand of 7 Wonders, you’ll be obsessed. In this game, you’re the leader of one of the great ancient civilizations, and you race to collect resources to build your city and erect an architectural wonder. It’s a great game for history buffs!

Get Asmodee 7 Wonders on Amazon for $44.99

10. A crowd favorite that’s racked up numerous awards

Ticket to Ride has won awards all around the world, and there are dozens of spin-offs and expansions for you to enjoy. During this popular game, players build train routes across the country, trying to create the longest route and cut off competitors along the way. It will definitely bring out your competitive side!

Get Days of Wonder Ticket To Ride on Amazon for $24.99

11. An incredibly challenging cooperative game

Oh, Pandemic. I have a love-hate relationship with this game. On one hand, I love the cooperative, incredibly challenging gameplay, but on the other hand, I hate that I’m so bad at it!

During Pandemic, everyone works together to save the world from an outbreak of diseases. You have to simultaneously slow the spread for four diseases, all while trying to find the cure. It’s addicting, yet frustrating, and the perfect game for anyone who loves a challenge.

Get Pandemic on Amazon for $35.99

12. Another popular cooperative game—with a spooky plot

Together, you and your friends will explore a creepy old haunted house when you play Betrayal at House on the Hill. You’ll encounter lots of spooky scenarios, and eventually, one player will become a traitor. Reviewers say this game is awesome, but it can take a while to pick up all the rules.

Get Avalon Hill Betrayal At House On The Hill on Amazon for $34.67

13. A family-friendly game for mythology lovers

Don’t be fooled by the cutesy illustrations—this game is not as easy as it seems! Santorini can be played by kids as young as 8, and during gameplay, you strive to build a structure three stories high and climb to the top of it. It sounds easy, but the addition of “god cards” will keep you on your toes as you play the Greek mythology-inspired game.

Get Santorini Strategy Based Board Game from Target for $24.49

14. A classic board game with a pop culture twist

As the world patiently awaits the final season of Game of Thrones, you can hold yourself over with the popular Game of Thrones edition of Risk. Just like in the regular game, you’ll need a solid strategy to conquer the Seven Kingdoms and claim the Iron Throne.

What’s even better is there are two ways to play this game, so it won’t get old anytime soon.

Get USAopoly Risk Game of Thrones Strategy Board Game on Amazon for $53.17

15. Tetris brought to life

Love Tetris? Then you’ll definitely enjoy Blokus, a strategy game where you use Tetris-style pieces to take up as much space as possible.

Essentially, players take turns putting down pieces on the board, trying to claim territory and block their competitors. The game continues until no more blocks can be put down, and the person with the fewest pieces left in their hand is the winner. Simple, but oh so fun!

Get Mattel Games Blokus Game on Amazon for $15.29

16. An engaging maze game for children

Here’s another game with an average rating of 4.8, so you know it’s got to be good! Labyrinth is super fun for anyone age 8 and up (though reviewers say kids as young as 4 can play with a little help).

To play, you have to navigate traps and shifting walls as you race around the maze collecting treasure. It’s an engaging game for young children, and it can help teach them strategy, critical thinking, and cause-and-effect to boot!

Get Ravensburger Labyrinth Board Game on Amazon for $24.99

Prices are accurate at the time of publication, but may change over time.

Read or Share this story: https://usat.ly/2y3m7A3

The Secret History of the Racy Module That Almost Ruined Dungeons & Dragons

An epic Dungeons & Dragons campaign, any player will tell you, can take many hours. It’s not just a few rolls of the dice. Yet there is one D&D quest that’s more difficult than even the most fiendish homebrew game run by the most sadistic dungeon master: Finding an original copy of the module known as “Palace of the Silver Princess.”

“Palace” wasn’t your typical pre-packed, ready-to-play D&D module. It had dragons, sure, but it also featured an illustration of a woman tied up by her own hair—not too family-friendly, especially considering that the vaguely erotic image came at a time when parent company TSR was trying to get the role-playing game out of hobby shops and into big toy stores. The module was yanked almost immediately, doomed to become a piece of fabled D&D lore.

“Palace of the Silver Princess” began its life in 1980. Back then, the RPG was on the ascent, becoming the new hip thing on college campuses. It was also starting to attract the attention of religious groups and worried moms who painted D&D as a literal tool of the devil. So even as the game was on the rise, life at TSR headquarters in Lake Geneva, Wisconsin was plagued with fears that moral outrage could end the good times at any moment.

And so, to ensure Dungeon Module B3 never became the spark that started that blaze, it was scrapped. Now that D&D is once again cool, we asked some TSR veterans to recount the story of what really happened with “Palace of the Silver Princess.” Like all good adventures, the story involves sex, blood, and thievery. And a backhoe.

The Beginning

What became the “Palace of the Silver Princess” started as a project created by writer Jean Wells in 1980.

Kevin Hendryx, TSR game developer and designer, 1980-81: In essence, the philosophy of management [at that time] was that it was better to have anything to sell today than something of higher quality later, because the market was so hot and the demand so great that TSR was losing money by any delays. So crank out that product and damn the torpedoes.

That sort of outlook in TSR’s flush days was the poison that caused problems like a B3 module, and got up the nose of the product development people.

Lawrence Schick, TSR game developer and designer, 1979-81: Upper management regarded employees as second- or third-class citizens. They were obnoxious to work for. They were in another building uptown; we were downtown. Off by ourselves, it was a fun place to work. But management was high-handed, and not much interested in feedback that contradicted what they had in mind.

Kevin Hendryx: We had a very us-against-them attitude. As much as we were hot-headed little snots and not always the most professional, management was not the most professional either. Most of them were new to being in positions like that. They tended to treat it like a game, like we were just non-player characters being moved around the board.

They were warned. But management did not take these things seriously until the [“Palace of the Silver Princess”] module had been printed and somebody at the other office actually looked at it and flew into a fury.

Why the warnings and strong reaction? The original B3 module featured “The Illusion of the Decapus,” a S&M-styled illustration showing a woman bound by her own hair and tortured by nine demonic-looking characters. And in a time when the “Satanic Panic” was gaining momentum, claiming that D&D was a gateway to devil worship, the image posed a very real threat to the company’s bottom line.

The illustration that caused all the fuss: “The Illusion of the Decapus.”
TSR

Kevin Hendryx: They didn’t want anything that could be seen as or interpreted as in bad taste. They didn’t want anything that could be held up on a TV screen with someone saying, “Parents of America! Look at what your children are reading and playing!” An illustration like that was not going to fly.

The second problem? The original “Palace of the Silver Princess” had a full-page illustration the higher-ups couldn’t figure out at all. Management knew they were likenesses, and they thought they were being made fun of, but they weren’t sure.

Upper management at TSR couldn’t figure out if they were being made fun by this illustration.
TSR

Lawrence Schick: They were caricatures of people in development, not management. There were a lot of in-jokes in there. And if you aren’t “in” on the in-jokes, it can be easily misinterpreted. So it’s perilous to do that sort of thing. If you didn’t know who the caricatures were of, you might guess, and you might guess wrong.

Kevin Hendryx: The illustration alluded to recent terminations and employee unrest. Upper management was very sensitive about mutiny in the ranks at the time and took all these perceived slurs or snoot-cockings as an insult and a challenge.

The third problem? The module was navel-gazing pseudo-porn.

Bill Willingham, TSR artist, 1980-81: I was first to read the damn thing, and I was just shocked at how ridiculous it was. It was clearly the private fantasies of the author [Jean Wells, who died in 2012]. The Silver Princess character was also her persona in the Society of Creative Anachronism—a hauntingly lovely woman who destroyed hearts. I called it to the art director’s attention, and we went upstairs to editorial and Lawrence Schick. And at some point Lawrence, being the head of creative, called over to the business side and said, “Are you sure we want to do this?” And someone from the business side essentially said, “Hey, my wife plays mahjong with her, and she’ll give me shit if we don’t let her do her module. Just publish it. Don’t give us any more crap about this.”

Kevin Hendryx: Some of the people thought it was too suggestive. There was a lot of subliminal, Freudian-level erotica in there.

Bill Willingham: I used to call it “Phallus of the Silver Princess.” It was unprintable. It was badly written.

Stephen Sullivan, TSR editor and artist, 1980-84: Jean kind of straddled two camps. She was a good friend of mine, and very friendly with most of the designers. But she was also kind of part of management, and she was a good friend of [D&D co-creator] Gary Gygax’s. So when Jean sent this through, it came through with the same edict as Gary’s modules, which was, “Don’t touch this language.”

So when this thing came through, and the development people wanted to edit it, Jean went to Gary and said—and I know I’m going to make this sound more harsh than it actually was—”They’re changing my stuff, tell them not to do it.” And Gary reminded us all that we were not to change the designers’ word or intent in the work. We were just to proof it, do the production line, get it done. The artists didn’t want to work on it; it was so bad.

Kevin Hendryx: Most of us asked for our names to be taken off of it. That’s why you don’t see my name in the credits.

Bill Willingham: I quit TSR halfway through it. Someone else finished my illustrations.

Rolling the Dice

Ultimately, B3 was printed. It was given an orange cover and copies were distributed to the staff. Then chaos set in.

Lawrence Schick: There were some text passages that were deemed problematic. There was a tone to many of the illustrations, [staff artist] Erol Otus’ in particular, that were darkly humorous in a way that management didn’t like. But they would have overlooked that if it wasn’t for that one illustration with bondage overtones. D&D was under attack by religious conservatives at the time, and TSR thought that releasing the original B3 would be just throwing red meat to the mad dogs.

Kevin Hendryx: My vague memory is that the module came out late in the week, management caught wind of it over the weekend, and by Monday, they were recalling it. They were seizing the warehouse copies and grabbing the undistributed stock. It happened very, very fast. One day they were handing out our office copies, and one day we were told that supervisors were collecting copies, telling people to turn theirs in. Most of us, having got a whiff of what was going on, were busy squirreling ours away.

The land rush was on. D&D was aboil in the zeitgeist, and everyone knew the “banned” module would be a collectors’ item. Editorial staff members hid their single copies, and rumors persist to this day that management liberated cases at a time. The print run was ordered destroyed.

Stephen Sullivan: I don’t know how many were printed. My guess is between 5,000 and 10,000. I do know someone—who I’m not going to name now—that had direct knowledge of what was going on. The person I talked to said, and I quote, “The modules were buried at the Lake Geneva landfill along with all the rest of Lake Geneva’s trash. This I know for sure.” And I know that they made sure that someone was standing there, watching them get buried, and that person was [late TSR handyman] Dan Matheson. Now whether they had to hire another backhoe other than the usual one that would have been there at the landfill, I don’t know. That’s been a persistent rumor for a long time.

Kevin Hendryx: I find it funny that management was so concerned about anyone filching copies of B3 that they had employees like Dan—who was a big, imposing bear of a fellow, burly and bearded—riding shotgun on the garbage dump. But I don’t think there was a sacrificial pit with glyphs of warding put over it. It was more mundane than that.

The Great Quest

The module was totally rewritten, and four offending pieces of art were replaced. A new version of “Palace of the Silver Princess” was printed, this time with a green cover, in 1981.

By 1984, copies of the original, orange-covered version started sneaking out, selling at auction for as much as $300. By the 2000s, copies were trading for $1,000-$3,000. A YouTube video references a Jean Wells-signed copy that sold for $5,860. Soon fans were starting quests to find more of the modules.

Stephen Sullivan: The rumor was that they buried them behind the [management] building out on Sheridan Springs Road. And this person who I’ve spoken to, who has more direct knowledge of their fate, says that they were definitely buried in the landfill along with all the other garbage.

‘It’s like Bigfoot, except the first edition of this module actually exists. It can be seen.’

Lawrence Schick, TSR game developer and designer, 1979-81

Mark Finn, author of Chance of a Lifetime: I was a hardcore Dungeons & Dragons player back in the 1980s. When Bill [Willingham] was in Austin, we started a weekly meetup group for fiction writers. One day, when telling TSR stories, Bill said, “I’ll tell you about the worst module we ever had to deal with,” and … I didn’t even remember “Palace of the Silver Princess.” But he launched into this whole thing, a backhoe, burying pallets of the module. The story bounced around in my head like a pachinko ball. For a brief moment, I thought, “We should go there! Dig ’em up! We should totally do this!” Ultimately, I chickened out. But I wrote the book.

You know, those are shrink-wrapped. I’ll bet they’re still there!

Stephen Sullivan: I suppose you could excavate the Lake Geneva landfill, like an archaeological dig. I suppose you could try.

TSR has largely made peace with its “Palace” past. The official D&D website even briefly had a full version of the original module you could download. And time provides perspective.

Lawrence Schick: I think that the reaction to the module is more interesting than the module itself. The actual content of it is only mildly eccentric by current standards. It’s more a matter of what a light it shines on the management reaction at the time, and the “Satanic Panic.” It’s like Bigfoot, except the first edition of this module actually exists. It can be seen.

Kevin Hendryx: Too much of this gaming history is liable to be lost if journalists weren’t recording at least a little of it. Thanks.

Mark Finn: It’s very inside baseball. You have to know what this is to go looking for it. That said, I’ve had more than one person give me some iteration of this story: “Hey, I heard about this crazy module they had to destroy. You know anything about that?” I love this piece of gaming history. Nice that you’re giving it a folklorist’s treatment.

Bill Willingham: I call shenanigans. You call this an oral history. But you’re writing this down. This is an oral history in the sense that foothills are made of feet, or that a tiger shark is part tiger, part shark. Come to think of it, that could be a cool D&D creature.


More Great WIRED Stories

Stuck on Chrome? Always use Safari? It may be time to break up with your default Web browser

CLOSE

Apple is tackling smartphone addiction and adding group video chats to FaceTime in the new iOS12. USA TODAY

CONNECTTWEETLINKEDIN 1 COMMENTEMAILMORE

Apple’s announcement that it will add significantly stronger privacy protections to its Safari browser should remind everybody, even people not using Apple’s software, that you don’t have to stick with the same old browser.

That’s especially true now that Apple, Microsoft and Firefox developer Mozilla are putting renewed effort into competing with Google’s Chrome — the web’s dominant desktop browser with 62.9% of that market in Net Applications’ measurements and 66.93% in StatCounter’s metrics. It’s also the default browser on most Android phones.

This four-player competition leaves you with some interesting choices to make based on which desktop and mobile operating system you use and the browsers available for it.

• In Windows, your top alternatives to Microsoft’s built-in Edge are Chrome and Firefox but not Safari (Apple stopped updating the Windows version almost six years ago).

• On a Mac, you can switch from Safari to Chrome or Firefox; Microsoft has not shipped a Mac version of Edge.

• On Android, your leading replacements for Chrome as the default browser are Firefox and Edge.

• Sorry, iOS users; you can’t set another browser as the default, and Apple requires that such third-party browsers as the iOS versions of Chrome, Firefox and Edge be built on the same framework code as Safari.

Within those constraints, if privacy is your priority, Safari is the strongest option. It already blocks a lot of third-party tracking by default, and the upcoming version arriving with iOS 12 and macOS Mojave this fall will also block the tracking done by Like and Share buttons of such social networks as Facebook.

More: Amazon Echo, Apple HomePod or Google Home: which is smarter about playing music? We tested them

More: Apple at WWDC shows 7 ways iOS 12 will change your next iPhone

(Since USA TODAY’s site includes those buttons as well as Facebook-based comments, expect a dialog asking if you want Facebook to track your activity here before interacting with those features.)

Firefox offers comparable tracking protection, but it’s not turned on by default. To activate, click or tap its three-horizontal-lines menu button, select “Preferences” and then “Privacy & Security.”

Chrome’s strongest selling point remains security. Google has stayed well ahead of Apple, Microsoft and Firefox in such areas as supporting stronger site encryption and allowing you to confirm a login by plugging in a “U2F” USB security key (an option Google added back in 2014) instead of having to grab your phone and enter a two-step verification code.

Edge was until last fall a Windows-only product and it has offered some thoughtful features like the ability to mark up a page using the cursor, your fingertip or a stylus. Microsoft has also touted Edge’s ability to extend a laptop’s battery life, although recent third-party testing suggests Chrome is closing that gap.

If your biggest complaint about the Web is the visual clutter on many Web pages, Safari, Edge and Firefox offer “reader” views that show just the core text and maybe some images of a page. Safari’s works at more sites (for instance, USA TODAY’s) and even lets you set especially-noisy sites to open automatically in Reader mode.

Chrome lacks that feature but now automatically blocks the most disruptive ad formats. Speaking of annoying formats: If a site still insists you run Adobe’s on-the-way-out Flash plug-in, Chrome and Edge are your safest options to view that content, since both embed a locked-down version of that software.

If you want to keep your bookmarks and browsing history in sync across multiple devices, you’ll have to stick to one company’s browser on all your devices. Note that Chrome’s sync feature requires storing your browsing history with Google, although you can add a passphrase to secure that data from its ad tracking.

Some sites may require Google Chrome or work better in that browser, which is not a good thing for the overall health of the Web as an open medium. That reminds me too much of the bad old days of Internet Explorer dominating that market.

And on that note: If you still use Internet Explorer, stop. Microsoft is putting its energy into the faster, more compatible and more secure Edge; if your PC runs Windows 7 or 8 instead of Edge’s required Win 10, switching to Chrome or Firefox will provide vastly better security on the Web. Yes, I know the browser stats cited above show more people using IE than Edge; that doesn’t make it right or smart.

Rob Pegoraro is a tech writer based out of Washington, D.C. To submit a tech question, e-mail Rob at rob@robpegoraro.com. Follow him on Twitter at twitter.com/robpegoraro.

CONNECTTWEETLINKEDIN 1 COMMENTEMAILMORE
Read or Share this story: https://usat.ly/2JHwQBk

Coral reefs save billions of dollars worldwide by preventing floods

CLOSE

Scientists say the coral reef off Australia’s Christmas Island appears to be dying. The scientists say that if the reef doesn’t thrive, neither will local fish, which are a major food and income source for the island population. (April 14) AP

CONNECTTWEETLINKEDINCOMMENTEMAILMORE

Coral reefs aren’t just pretty to look at: They also act as a natural flood protection barrier from powerful ocean storms.

But with reefs in danger around the world, much of this valuable flood protection could be lost. A study released Tuesday pinpoints the value of coral reefs, finding coastal flood-related damages around the world would be twice what they are now if not for this natural flood barrier.

On average, the entire planet’s coral reefs are worth some $4 billion annually in flood protection, said study lead author Michael Beck, a scientist at the Nature Conservancy and a professor at the University of California – Santa Cruz. Closer to home, he said “the United States receives nearly $100 million annually in direct flood reduction benefits from its reefs.

“The U.S. ranks 8th globally in terms of annual reef benefits to people and property in places such as Florida, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands and Guam.”

The countries with the most to gain from reef conservation and restoration are Indonesia, the Philippines, Malaysia, Mexico and Cuba. Per capita, the study found reefs provide the most benefits to small island states including the Cayman Islands, Belize, Grenada, Cuba, Bahamas, Jamaica and the Philippines.

More: Coral reefs under siege: Frequency of bleaching has increased almost fivefold since the ’80s

More: Coral reefs at severe risk as world’s oceans become more acidic

More: Great Barrier Reef has survived 5 near-death events but scientists unsure of its future

The devastating damage from recent tropical cyclones such as Hurricanes Irma and Maria and Typhoon Haiyan would have been much worse without coral reefs, the study found. Coral reefs are best at protecting coasts from the biggest waves during powerful storms.

“Unfortunately, we are already losing the height and complexity of shallow reefs around the world, so we are likely already seeing increases in flood damages along many tropical coastlines,” Beck said. “Our national economies are normally only valued by how much we take from nature. For the first time, we can now value what every national economy gains in flood savings by conserving its coral reefs every year.”

Globally, coral reefs face many threats, including coastal development, sand and coral mining, destructive and excessive fishing, storms and climate-related bleaching events.

Overall, the frequency of severe coral bleaching events has increased nearly fivefold in the past four decades, from once every 25 to 30 years in the early 1980s to once every six years in 2016, a study published earlier this year found.

Tuesday’s study adds to a growing body of research that calculates the monetary value of assets and services that nature provides us for free, Agence France-Presse reported.

Mangrove forests, for example, also protect against storm surges and serve as nurseries for dozens of aquatic species. They are disappearing at the rate of 1 to 2% each year, scientists say. In addition, bee populations that pollinate tens of billions of dollars worth of crops each year are collapsing, AFP said.

“Coral reefs are living ecosystems that can recover if they are well-managed, and this study identifies why and where we should find the needed support for restoration and management,” Beck said. “It is our hope that this science will lead to action and greater stewardship of reefs around the world.”

Tuesday’s study appeared in the peer-reviewed British journal Nature Communications.

Mass coral bleaching hits the Great Barrier Reef

Posted!

A link has been posted to your Facebook feed.

A handout photo made available by World Wide Fund for

A handout photo made available by World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) Australia on March 10, 2017, shows the Great Barrier Reef suffering mass coral bleaching for a second year in a row, at Vlassoff Cay, near Cairns, Australia, March 6, 2017. According to WWF Australia, the Great Barrier Reef has now been hit by four mass bleaching events: 1998, 2002, 2016, and 2017.  WWF/BIOPIXEL HANDOUT, EPA
This combination of two photos taken in March and May

This combination of two photos taken in March and May 2016 released by The Ocean Agency/XL Catlin Seaview Survey shows bleached coral, left, and the same coral which has died in Lizard Island on Australia’s Great Barrier Reef. Coral reefs, unique underwater ecosystems that sustain a quarter of the world’s marine species and half a billion people, are dying on an unprecedented scale. Scientists are racing to prevent a complete wipeout within decades.  Richard Vevers and Christophe Bailhache, AP
The Great Barrier Reef is suffering a mass coral bleaching

The Great Barrier Reef is suffering a mass coral bleaching for a second year in a row, at Vlassoff Cay, near Cairns, Australia, March 6, 2017.  WWF/BIOPIXEL HANDOUT, EPA
According to WWF Australia, the Great Barrier Reef

According to WWF Australia, the Great Barrier Reef has now been hit by four mass bleaching events: 1998, 2002, 2016, and 2017.  WWF/BIOPIXEL HANDOUT, EPA

Like this topic? You may also like these photo galleries:

    Replay
Autoplay
Show Thumbnails
Show Captions

CONNECTTWEETLINKEDINCOMMENTEMAILMORE
Read or Share this story: https://usat.ly/2MkZvhu

Musk tells fans 'full self-driving' Teslas are near, as investigators dig into Autopilot accidents

CLOSE

The new Tesla Model Y may not have a steering wheel. Buzz60

CONNECTTWEETLINKEDIN 8 COMMENTEMAILMORE

SAN FRANCISCO — In August, Tesla electric cars will offer “full self-driving features,” CEO Elon Musk tweeted over the weekend.

But aside from that brief description, written in response to an owner’s comments about Tesla’s Autopilot suite of driver-assist features, Musk didn’t give any more details about just how autonomous his cars would be.

In the tweet, which addressed a concern about Autopilot wavering in high-traffic lane-merging situations, Musk said “that issue is better in latest Autopilot software rolling out now & fully fixed in August update as part of our long-awaited Tesla Version 9.”

He added that “to date, Autopilot resources have rightly focused entirely on safety (and) with V9 (version 9), we will begin to enable full self-driving features.”

That issue is better in latest Autopilot software rolling out now & fully fixed in August update as part of our long-awaited Tesla Version 9. To date, Autopilot resources have rightly focused entirely on safety. With V9, we will begin to enable full self-driving features.

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 10, 2018

Just what “full self-driving” means to Musk remains in question. Tesla would not comment beyond the CEO’s tweets.

The Society of American Engineers has a ranking system for self-driving cars, with SAE Level 1 referring to systems such as basic cruise control, while Levels 4 and 5 refer to vehicles that need little to no human oversight.

Tesla’s Autopilot is considered an SAE Level 2 system, which combines adaptive cruise control and lane keeping assist technology. Tesla repeatedly has asserted that its system needs driver monitoring and is not meant to replicate self-driving tech.

Fully and semi-self-driving auto tech has been under a microscope lately as federal investigators continue to investigate crashes of vehicles that were using such systems.

In March, an Uber self-driving car killed a pedestrian in Arizona when its sensors and on-board safety driver failed to notice the woman crossing in the middle of the road in the dark.

And two recent Tesla crashes involved Autopilot, one in which a California driver was killed when his car veered into a highway barrier and another when a distracted Utah driver hit a parked fire truck at 60 mph. Neither had their hands on the wheels for some time before the crash.

Tesla electric cars such as the Model S and Model X are known for their sleek looks, hefty price tags and rapid acceleration. The company is rushing to ramp up production of its entry-level Model 3 sedan.

And there’s a chance Tesla could soon be rocket-ship fast. Musk also tweeted that the new version of his Roadster two-door sports coupe will feature a SpaceX option, a nod to his rocket company.

SpaceX option package for new Tesla Roadster will include ~10 small rocket thrusters arranged seamlessly around car. These rocket engines dramatically improve acceleration, top speed, braking & cornering. Maybe they will even allow a Tesla to fly …

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 9, 2018

“SpaceX option package for new Tesla Roadster will include ~10 small rocket thrusters arranged seamlessly around car,” Musk tweeted. “These rocket engines dramatically improve acceleration, top speed, braking & cornering. Maybe they will even allow a Tesla to fly …”

It’s tempting to see this as a joke. But with Musk, you never know. After all, most people thought he was joking about selling flame throwers, and now they’re in customer hands.

Follow USA TODAY tech culture writer Marco della Cava on Twitter.

Elon Musk: Tech pioneer

Posted!

A link has been posted to your Facebook feed.

 Elon Musk CEO of SpaceX, speaks to the media during

Elon Musk CEO of SpaceX, speaks to the media during a press conference after the Falcon Heavy Launch on Feb. 6, 2018.  CRAIG BAILEY/FLORIDA TODAY VIA USA TODAY NETWORK
Tesla founder Elon Musk presenting the new Roadster

Tesla founder Elon Musk presenting the new Roadster electric sports vehicle (on background), presented to media on Nov. 16, 2017 at Tesla’s Los Angeles design center. Tesla says the Roadster will accelerate from 0-60 mph in less than two seconds. Tesla says the new Roadster will cost $200,000 and will be released in three years.  /TESLA HANDOUT VIA EPA-EFE
PayPal Chief Executive Officer Peter Thiel, left, and

PayPal Chief Executive Officer Peter Thiel, left, and founder Elon Musk, right, pose with the PayPal logo at corporate headquarters in Palo Alto, Calif., on Oct. 20, 2000. Elon Musk made his fortune off PayPal. Online auction giant eBay Inc. announced Monday, July 8, 2002, it would buy the electronic payment facilitator for more than $1.3 billion in stock.   PAUL SAKUMA/ASSOCIATED PRESS
SpaceX CEO Elon Musk congratulates teams competing

SpaceX CEO Elon Musk congratulates teams competing on the Hyperloop Pod Competition II at SpaceX’s Hyperloop track in Hawthorne, Calif on Aug. 27, 2017. A committee of the Los Angeles City Council on April 18, 2018, approved an environmental review exemption for a Los Angeles-area tunnel that Elon Musk wants to dig to test a novel underground transportation system.  DAMIAN DOVARGANES/AP
SpaceX's newest rocket, the Falcon Heavy, the most

SpaceX’s newest rocket, the Falcon Heavy, the most powerful rocket in the world, lifts off on it first demonstration flight. The rocket leapt off Pad 39A at the Kennedy Space Center in Florida at 3:45pm. on Feb. 6, 2018.  CRAIG BAILEY/FLORIDA TODAY VIA USA TODAY NETWORK
This image from video provided by SpaceX shows Elon

This image from video provided by SpaceX shows Elon Musk’s red Tesla sports car with a dummy driver named “Starman” which was launched into space during the first test flight of the Falcon Heavy rocket on Feb. 6, 2018.  /SPACEX VIA AP
The twin boosters from SpaceX's newest rocket, the

The twin boosters from SpaceX’s newest rocket, the Falcon Heavy make a successful landing at Landing Zone 1 at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station on Feb. 6, 2018.  CRAIG BAILEY/FLORIDA TODAY VIA USA TODAY NETWORK
President Trump talks with Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon

President Trump talks with Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, center, and White House chief strategist Steve Bannon during a meeting with business leaders in the State Dining Room of the White House in Washington, Feb. 3, 2017.  EVAN VUCCI/AP
Tesla Motors CEO Elon Musk speaks about the Interplanetary

Tesla Motors CEO Elon Musk speaks about the Interplanetary Transport System which aims to reach Mars with the first human crew in history, in the conference given by Tesla Motors CEO Elon Musk during the 67th International Astronautical Congress in Guadalajara, Mexico on September 27, 2016.  HECTOR-GUERRERO/AFP/GETTY IMAGES
Tesla Motors CEO Elon Musk unveils the Model X at

Tesla Motors CEO Elon Musk unveils the Model X at a launch event in Fremont, Calif on Sept. 29, 2015. The Tesla Motors X is an all-wheel drive SUV featuring a 90 kWh battery providing 250 miles of range and will be able to go from 0 to 60 mph in 3.2 seconds.   ROBERT HANASHIRO/USA TODAY
CEO and Chief Product Architect of Tesla Motors, Elon

CEO and Chief Product Architect of Tesla Motors, Elon Musk shows of his throwback t-shirt of the “Tesla” heavy metal band on January 24, 2015 in Park City, Utah.  LILY LAWRENCE/GETTY IMAGES FOR OCEANIC PRESERVATION SOCIETY
Elon Musk, Tesla CEO, discusses new technologies before

Elon Musk, Tesla CEO, discusses new technologies before an event for Tesla owners and the media held at the Hawthorne Airport. In the background is a Tesla model P85D.   ROBERT HANASHIRO/USA TODAY
SpaceX CEO Elon Musk unveils SpaceX's new seven-seat

SpaceX CEO Elon Musk unveils SpaceX’s new seven-seat Dragon V2 spacecraft, in Hawthorne, California on May 29, 2014. The private spaceflight companys new manned space capsule is designed to ferry NASA astronauts to and from the International Space Station. The capsule was named for “Puff the Magic Dragon,” a jab at those who scoffed when Musk founded the company in 2002 and set the space bar exceedingly high. SpaceX went on to become the first private company to launch a spacecraft into orbit and return it safely to Earth in 2010.   ROBYN BECK/AFP/GETTY IMAGES
Elon Musk CEO, Cofounder, Chief Product Architect for

Elon Musk CEO, Cofounder, Chief Product Architect for Tesla with a new Model S car outside the Tesla customer delivery area at the Tesla Fremont factory on June 21, 2012.  /JESSICA BRANDI LIFLAND FOR USA TODAY
Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla Motors, poses with a Tesla

Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla Motors, poses with a Tesla car in front of Nasdaq following the electric automakerís initial public offering on June, 29, 2010, in New York.  /MARK LENNIHAN, AP
Tesla Motors president and CEO Ze'ev Drori, left, and

Tesla Motors president and CEO Ze’ev Drori, left, and Tesla Motors chairman Elon Musk, right, pose in the Tesla Motors development facility in San Carlos, just south of San Francisco next to a Tesla Roadster on Feb. 19, 2008. The Tesla Roadster, a $99,000 electric sports car powered by laptop computer batteries, is 100 percent electric, can go from 0-60 mph in four seconds and the electric car gets an equivalent of 135 mpg compared to a gas powered vehicle. Production begins mid-March. The car itself is being made in England.  JACK GRUBER/USA TODAY
Elon Musk stands in front of parts of the first stage

Elon Musk stands in front of parts of the first stage of the Falcon 9 rocket at the company’s headquarters in El Segundo, Calif. on Sept. 18, 2007.   DAN MACMEDAN/USA TODAY

Like this topic? You may also like these photo galleries:

    Replay
Autoplay
Show Thumbnails
Show Captions

CONNECTTWEETLINKEDIN 8 COMMENTEMAILMORE
Read or Share this story: https://usat.ly/2Mh2QhD

Samsung Galaxy S9 is faster than iPhone X in tests; Verizon still speediest network

When it comes to benefiting from the fastest wireless network, the device you hold can make all the difference.

Samsung’s latest Galaxy S9 flagship outraced the iPhone X, according to drive tests conducted in May by PCMag with crowdsourced speed data from Ookla’s Speedtest Intelligence.

The Galaxy S9 recorded download and upload speeds in May of 41.80 Megabits per second and 11.36 Mbps, respectively, compared to 31.18 Mbps and 9.88 Mbps for the iPhone X.

But the iPhone X is hardly a slowpoke. PCMag points out that the iPhone X has something called 256QAM, which means it can pack more information into one burst of data than the iPhone 7 did.

Regardless of phone, the cellphone networks are just getting faster.

For the fifth year in a row, Verizon Wireless cemented its position as having the fastest mobile network in the U.S. It won or tied in 19 of the 36 cities tested, leading in every region of the U.S. except the Southeast, where it placed behind the overall runner-up T-Mobile.

AT&T ranked third overall. Sprint, which is waiting on regulatory approval to merge with far faster T-Mobile, pulled up the rear. But even the fourth-place finisher had something to cheer: Sprint’s download speeds rocketed up recently; the carrier led in downloads in five cities.

PCMag reports that T-Mobile’s strength came in mobile uploads, which bodes well for those of you on the network who create a lot of content for social media.

And the good news overall is that compared to last year’s tests, all the carriers are delivering faster and more consistent 4G LTE connections.

PCMag’s analysts spent May 2018 driving within and between 30 cities, with four Samsung Galaxy S9 phones continually running speed tests based on a customized version of Ookla’s Speedtest.net software. Both PCMag and Ookla are owned by publisher Ziff Davis. Testers collected more than 124,000 data points and then balanced downloads, uploads, latency and reliability to create a “Speed Score.”

Verizon’s score was 99. T-Mobile, AT&T and Sprint followed with scores of 93, 88 and 75, respectively.

More: Why Sprint customers should hope the T-Mobile deal succeeds

More: 5G speed phones: We now know when they’re coming, and where

While the tests obviously measure the performance of existing 4G mobile networks, the future is all about 5G, which you’ll increasingly hear more about toward the end of this year and into 2019 and beyond.

Each carrier is embarking on its own 5G course. AT&T and Verizon are going for top 5G speeds over smaller areas. T-Mobile’s 5G, on the other hand, may not prove quite as fast as its rivals, but the nation’s third-largest carrier is looking to blanket the nation.

Email: ebaig@usatoday.com; Follow USA TODAY Personal Tech Columnist @edbaig on Twitter

Read or Share this story: https://usat.ly/2MmR5pB