Curt Long

Curt Long

‘Heaven Will Be Mine’ Review: In Space, No One Can Hear You Reach Out

by

It’s 1981, in a version of reality where the Cold War was waged not human to human, but human to extraterrestrial enemy from beyond the stars. To fight, we developed robot bodies to wear in space; these Ship-Selves are advanced and almost unkillable, weapons and homes and clothes and identities all rolled into one. And, of course, we got teenagers to pilot them.

This is the world of Heaven Will Be Mine, a new visual novel from Worst Girls Games, the development team that who previously created We Know the Devil. Like that game, Heaven is a story of messy, defiant young queer people trying to figure out their relationships and themselves—only this time, instead of summer camp, they’re in giant robots, kicking each others’ asses as a means of collective therapy. In space, no one can hear you reach out for intimacy.

Violence in narrative is often a metaphor for intimacy. When two characters fight, it reveals their personalities in the clash, changing or complicating their relationship. In Heaven Will Be Mine, the metaphor falls away; fights are intimacy. Instead of dating your favorite girl like in many dating sim visual novels, you fight her with your Ship-Self, the two of you breaking each others’ bodies as you argue and grow, either together or apart.

Riffing off of giant robot anime like Mobile Suit Gundam or Tengen Toppa Gurren Lagan, the game assumes that giant robots have always been stand-ins for identity, for the way we build and shape ourselves, and simply decides to make that subtext text. It’s an elegant move, bolstered by fantastically expressive art and slick, minimalistic user interfaces. The game looks and feels like fighting your girlfriends in space, which is a triumph.

The elegance is a bit marred, however, by the opacity of the writing (which comes courtesy of Aevee Bee, who along with artist Mia Schwartz consitutes the entirety of Worst Girls Games). Narratively, Heaven Will Be Mine is of a piece with its predecessor: florid and effervescent, sketching out its characters impressionistically. But those goals wind up at odds with the genre Heaven Will Be Mine occupies, in which the worldbuilding stands paramount—and as such it can be hard to clearly follow what’s happening, or what all of the vividly described proper nouns in the story are.

This is fine, as a strategy; there is far too little poetry in games as it is. But it makes the characters and their stories feel distant from the player, caught in some beautiful, tragic story that you can’t quite access. I was rarely wholesale confused, but I found that I often only had a vague grasp of the histories of the characters’ relationships, or the emotional stakes of their encounters. I could tell that it mattered—I just couldn’t quite explain how.

Those problems make Heaven Will Be Mine interesting to play, but not as easy to recommend as I’d like. The premise is inspired, and every moment has style to spare. It’s also straightforward to play, ideal for fans not incredibly familiar with visual novels. But it doesn’t tug on the heartstrings the way it so clearly wants to. Heaven Will Be Mine is full of explosive action and sexuality, but in space, well, everything’s a little cold.

More Great WIRED Stories

Quantum Computing Will Create Jobs. But Which Ones?

by

Chris Monroe’s vision for quantum computers is simple: He wants people to use them. Monroe, a physicist and co-founder of the quantum computing startup IonQ, wants the machines to be as sleek as the iPhone. He wants people to code on them without needing to understand complicated quantum physics. Basically, he wants the devices to be so intuitive that, on a lonely evening in 2050, a high schooler will log on to invent the cultural equivalent of Snapchat—but quantum.

The industry has a ways to go. They have a timeline, sort of, give or take a few decades. And at the moment, their roadmap has at least one glaring pothole: a lack of trained people. “Quantum computer scientists are in high demand right now,” says Monroe. “I would know. IonQ has a lot of trouble hiring people.”

This dilution refrigerator keeps Intel’s quantum computing chip cooled within a degree of absolute zero.
Intel

And hiring will only get harder, as companies like IonQ, Intel, D-Wave, and Google race to build bigger and better quantum computers. “There’s definitely a shortage of people coming,” says Christian Weedbrook, the CEO of Canada-based quantum computing company Xanadu.

That’s why Monroe, along with a team of other quantum computing experts, helped put together and lobby a Congressional bill called the National Quantum Initiative. The bill basically guides federal science agencies to invest in quantum technology—quantum computers, quantum cryptography, and other devices that obey quantum mechanical rules, rather than classic binary logic—for the next 10 years. A key part of the bill also instructs the agencies to train people, from students to professionals, for quantum-computing-related jobs, in the next 10 years.

The bill has yet to be scheduled for a full vote in either the House or Senate, but both versions of it have moved through their respective legislative processes with bipartisan support. The House science committee passed it unanimously. (Their version authorizes $1.275 billion dollars in spending, although appropriators in Congress, who decide the actual amount of funds, often grant less than the authorized amount.) “There’s a real sense of optimism around the bill,” says Jim Clarke, the director of quantum hardware at Intel. “It appears to be bipartisan in both houses, and it can tackle a lot of workforce problems in this space as the technology emerges.” Of all America’s issues right now, it was quantum computing that brought Democrats and Republicans together this summer.

The newly developed field spans physics, computer science, chemistry, and more—which is why it’s so hard to find people with the right job qualifications, says Jim Held, the director of emerging technologies at Intel. If you work on quantum computing software, you need to know how to write good code. If you’re trying to use quantum computers to simulate molecules—one of the most promising near-term applications—you have to know chemistry. And of course, you need to understand quantum physics to follow what the computers are doing. “There are concepts like entanglement that have no counterpart in today’s computers,” says Held, referring to the strange statistical rules that quantum bits obey. Ultimately, companies often have to do a fair amount of job training for new hires.

In particular, the industry needs more people who can work on quantum computing hardware, says Alan Baratz, a senior vice president of Canada-based quantum computing company D-Wave. Physicists like to fantasize about the potential of the technology, like breaking modern encryption methods for good, or discovering a complex molecule for a drug, but they can’t do any of that on existing quantum computers. They need to make machines that are many thousands of times more powerful, which basically means figuring out how to cram more stuff on a chip. But unlike silicon chips, many of the leading quantum chip designs require the use of superconductors that can only function at temperatures near absolute zero. They need more engineers who know how to work with super cold stuff, says Baratz.

The bill largely leaves the details to the agencies, but government-sponsored training could involve developing educational programs at universities. “I expect in 10 years at the University of Maryland, we’ll have a quantum engineering or quantum computing major,” says Monroe, who also teaches at that school.

Government funding could also help companies and universities work together to train students. IBM and Google have already put versions of their baby quantum computers on the internet for anybody to play with, and while it’s hard for a noob to do anything interesting with them yet, these machines or something similar could be incorporated into a university curriculum, says Held.

The bill also instructs the National Science Foundation to build up to five institutes for training people to work in quantum computing. These institutes could help train professional engineers to transition into quantum computing careers. For example, Xanadu is looking to hire experts who understand silicon-based processors because they want to use quantum computers to speed up artificial intelligence techniques.

But more structured training isn’t just about building better hardware. The big question remains: What are quantum computers actually good for? Experts have some ideas, like optimizing shipping logistics or designing fertilizers. But to really figure out its potential, the industry needs to make the computers more accessible to everybody, not just quantum physicists, says Monroe. If you want the masses to start using quantum computers, you have to teach them what the hell they do.

More Great WIRED Stories

Google Faces Hurdles in China Beyond Censorship

by

In April, the founder of multibillion dollar Chinese startup Bytedance made a striking public statement. “Our product took the wrong path, and content appeared that was incommensurate with socialist core values,” Zhang Yiming said, in a message widely distributed by state-controlled media. He pledged that Bytedance would work harder to “promote positive energy and to grasp correct guidance of public opinion.”

Zhang’s grovelling apology came after Chinese authorities temporarily removed Bytedance’s Toutiao news aggregator from app stores for featuring “vulgar” content. Three weeks later, the app, which has more than 100 million users, was restored.

The incident offers an indicator of the perilous environment awaiting Google if it carries through on reported plans to launch search and news aggregator apps in China.

China’s internet market is much larger and more lucrative than when Google pulled its desktop search app and withdrew from the country eight years ago after phishing attacks targeted Chinese activists using Gmail. The country now has more than 770 million internet users, most of whom access it via a device running Google’s open source Android mobile operating system. But the demands China’s government places on internet companies have grown significantly, too.

“China’s regulatory environment is more restrictive than in 2010,” says Lotus Ruan, who tracks online information controls in the country for the University of Toronto’s Citizen Lab. “In the name of ‘rule of law,’ the state is releasing more and more laws and regulations to control internet activities.”

The prospect of Chinese riches has lured other tech companies. Apple’s iPhone has long been popular in the country; the company attributed nearly one-fifth of the $55 billion quarterly revenue it reported last week to China. LinkedIn agreed to censor its content when it entered the country in 2014. And The New York Times reported last month that Facebook has been trying to open a China office.

Google may face political trouble at home too. Six US senators wrote to Google CEO Sundar Pichai Friday asking him to explain the company’s plans regarding China. The letter said any plan to launch services in the country “risks making Google complicit in human rights abuses related to China’s rigorous censorship regime.”

China’s public would probably be open to trying services from Google, says Paul Triolo, who tracks Chinese technology markets and policy at Eurasia Group. “From Chinese users’ point of view, these services could be beneficial, I would argue that they would probably have a lot of users,” he says.

But if Google goes ahead, it will have to comply with a broad new cybersecurity law introduced last year. That law imposes some of the country’s first rules to protect consumers from corporate invasions of privacy—and restrictions on tech companies that place consumer data more easily within government reach. In addition, the government has ordered companies to store data for longer periods, and tightened enforcement of a rule requiring online accounts match a person’s real identity.

Implementation of the sweeping new regulations is ongoing, but it has already forced notable changes in how Chinese and US tech companies operate. One provision of the law restricts transfers of data out of the country, keeping the information within easier reach of authorities. Another mandates that cloud services must be operated by Chinese companies.

It’s why Apple in February transferred management of the Chinese version of its iCloud service that stores data such as messages and photos—and the encryption keys securing them—to a state-controlled company. Chinese authorities used to have to go to Apple to gain access to its users’ data. Now they may not. Bloombergreported Friday that Google hopes to offer cloud services in China, out of data centers run by local companies.

Google’s business and product plans are unconfirmed, making it hard to know exactly which parts of China’s regulations would apply. What’s been disclosed suggests the company would possess user data that could be alluring to Chinese authorities enforcing the country’s controls on political expression.

That could force Google to play an active role in unsavory policies. In 2005, writers Wang Xiaoning and Shi Tao were sentenced to 10 years in prison for, respectively, promoting democracy and leaking Communist Party documents, after Yahoo disclosed their personal data to the Chinese government. The company later settled a lawsuit brought by Shi’s family.

In the US and other markets, Google’s ad business relies on building rich profiles of people’s online activity such as web searches, which are used by advertisers to target their audience. Google could conceivably operate a search app without such profiles, by showing ads based solely on the query a person entered. But Google also plans to launch a personalized news-aggregation app in China, according to The Information.

Hundreds of millions of people in China already use such services, such as Toutiao, which employ machine learning to customize a user’s content. To compete, Google would probably need to collect rich profiles on its users, says Graham Webster, a senior fellow with the Paul Tsai China Center at Yale. “The company would be holding data that would show what users are interested in reading,” says Webster. “If a new topic became newly sensitive, theoretically the authorities could ask to see who has been accessing that information.”

Figuring out what authorities could ask for could become a constant headache for Google executives, were the company to offer new services in China.

US government demands on Google and other tech companies may not always be transparent, as the Snowden revelations showed. But they generally come via a known legal process that gives companies some mechanism by which to object. Chinese authorities do use court orders and regulations to request data from companies. They also use surveillance and apply informal and secretive pressures that can be unpredictable, says Ruan, of Citizen Lab. “The challenge for Google is that many of these laws are vaguely defined and often subject to interpretation by the authorities,” she says.

Bytedance’s public humiliation this spring helps illustrate that point. The company’s travails began with criticism of its services from state media, including complaints that a video app hosted clips of unmarried teenage moms discussing their lives, something China Daily said “does not accord with traditional values.”

Depending on how they were implemented, censorship tools or other systems built by Google to comply with China’s authoritarian internet policies could conflict with ethical principles for use of AI technology the company released in June. The principles state that Google “will not design or deploy AI … whose purpose contravenes widely accepted principles of international law and human rights.” They were introduced after employee protests over a Pentagon contract.

Before Google can launch apps, it would need approval from the Cybersecurity Administration of China, which regulates the internet, as well as political clearance from the very top of China’s government.

Last week’s reports suggest Google’s making progress on both fronts. Company staff are said to have demonstrated versions of search and news apps to regulators. The Intercept says Pichai met last December with Wang Huning, a member of the Chinese Politburo. Wang is a top adviser to President Xi Jinping on matters of both ideology and cyberspace, says Eurasia Group’s Triolo. “He’s the guy you’d have to get approval from, basically,” he says.

Triolo and others watching Chinese-US relations in technology believe approval is unlikely to come soon. The ongoing trade war instigated by President Trump would make Google launching new services in China politically unwelcome on both sides of the Great Firewall.

Critics of China’s internet controls don’t find that very consoling. Google’s steady series of quieter, public moves to expand its presence in China suggests the company isn’t about to give up. Google opened an AI research lab in Beijing last year, has invested $500 million into leading online retailer JD.com, and last month launched an AI-enhanced drawing game on the dominant mobile messaging platform WeChat. “The problem lies in the uncertainty in how much Google would appease the state for growth and profits,” Ruan says.

UPDATE, Aug. 6, 1:45PM: This story has been updated to include information about Google’s ethical principles for use of AI technology.

More Great WIRED Stories

The Alex Jones Lawsuit Will Redefine Free Speech, Win or Lose

by

Once upon a time, there was a fringe news outlet with a loud and dissenting opinion. A fatal shooting, it claimed, was not at all what it seemed to be: It was a hoax, orchestrated by some shadowy force—probably Communists—bent on replacing freedom with dictatorship. This was untrue, but that didn’t stop the outlet from naming and insulting alleged collaborators. And so the media outlet was sued for defamation.

This story might seem familiar, but we’re not actually talking about Alex Jones, the Infowars founder who infamously spread the lie that the Sandy Hook school shooting was an elaborate hoax—the grieving parents simply crisis actors—across YouTube, and is now being sued by Lenny Pozner and Veronique De La Rosa, the parents of Noah Pozner, a 6-year-old killed in the attack. We’re talking about Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., a Supreme Court case that will provide the legal precedent for the court to decide how hard or easy it will be to take Alex Jones to task for spreading lies.

Trouble is, that case was tried in 1974.

A lot has happened in the past half century. Most notably, the emergence of Jones’ preferred medium: the internet. In a case where the web is not only the vector of the defamation but also the means of targeted harassment campaigns, severe enough that Pozner’s parents have moved seven times in the past five years, that is a pretty serious context switch.

Thus far, Jones’ legal arguments remain embroiled in the nuances of free speech: Specifically, what kind of platform constitutes a serious media institution, and what kind of actions signify a public figure. While it’s hard to sympathize with a man who spent years haranguing the parents of a murdered first grader, in a time when the modes and impacts of speech are being redesigned and renegotiated with every software update and platform policy, these are pressing questions. Whether Jones wins or loses, his suit, according to First Amendment lawyers, will be a building block for the way we think of free speech in the age of the internet.

Whether Jones wins or loses, his suit, according to First Amendmentlawyers, will be a building block for the way we think of free speechin the age of the internet.

And now back to precedents. In 1964, the Supreme Court heard the case of a Montgomery Public Safety commissioner who felt defamed by an ad in The New York Times that claimed the police departments he supervised had arrested Martin Luther King Jr. seven times. (Really they’d just arrested King four times.) In the resulting case, New York Times v. Sullivan, the court bestowed special status to public officials like the commissioner: Defamation would require “actual malice,” a knowingly false statement in “reckless disregard” of the truth. This high bar was a way of protecting the First Amendment-guaranteed right to speak openly about those in power.

Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. added a new wrinkle in the form of another type of public figure—a “limited-purpose public figure,” who also required the high bar of malice. Jones claims that by entering the public debates on misinformation and gun control, De La Rosa and Pozner occupy this second group. (De La Rosa has advocated for an assault rifle ban, and Pozner founded a nonprofit devoted to fighting misinformation.)

This is where the context of the internet starts to matter. The law assumes a narrow notion of fame—not a world where a YouTube channel’s following can rival a media company’s and the parents of a slain child can instantly become household names. “The First Amendment is a legal tool … crafted in a particular time to deal with particular media environments,” says Neil Richards, a First Amendment expert at the University of Washington Law School. “Our libel model is one that envisions establishment media and a bunch of people gossiping. It doesn’t envision social media.”

The law assumes a narrow notion of fame—not a world where a YouTubechannel’s following can rival a media company’s.

Do Pozner and De La Rosa count as limited-purpose public figures? Maybe. “Arguments have been made that in the digital world, you can be a public figure in the context of a particular videogame,” says Sandra Baron, a resident fellow at Yale Law School. “Even if no one outside that community would have ever heard of you.” So the Sandy Hook parents’ #activism may qualify them by making them well known in gun control circles, while public moves like founding nonprofits would only cement that status.

Others have argued that their accidental fame is another reason to revisit the laws. Under the original Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., the justices decided that, while it was technically possible to become an involuntary limited-purpose public figure, someone who is thrust into the public debate by outside design, such instances would be “exceedingly rare.” Not so in the age of the web. Having a mob of conspiracy theorists pillory you for articulating grief over a murdered child seems exactly the sort of public entrance no one would make voluntarily—and in age of virality, such situations aren’t even uncommon. We are all one rogue tweet away from public figure-dom.

Yet Jones is walking a second, well-trod line: No reasonable person should take what Jones says as fact. In that way, his (multiple) defamation lawsuits are a legal test run for internet trolls’ favorite excuse for their bad behavior: LOL JK.

As always, digital trolls aren’t as edgy as they’d have you think. This excuse has relevant pre-internet case law behind it: A few shock jocks on talk radio have successfully deflected defamation cases by arguing that no one took their comments seriously. But even if Jones wins that argument, he might lose against Pozner and De La Rosa’s claims that he intentionally inflicted emotional distress. See, the tale of the shock jock cuts both ways: According to Baron, shock jocks were the only defendants she ever saw lose to that argument, because their behavior—while performative—was considered so outside any form of civilized norm. Might harassing (and doxing) the parents of a murdered child qualify? It’s apparently not outside the internet’s moral code. IRL, it’ll depend on the judge, and the jury.

For the most part, this push and pull between internet and legal norms is a good thing—as long as it continues to evolve. “We adjusted the law to deal with the mass market media era of television and newspapers,” Richards says. “It’s clear that First Amendment doctrine needs to evolve, not to undo freedom of speech, but to ensure the values of public debate and of democratic self-government continue in a digital environment.”

That might mean adjusting what it means to be a public figure, so victims of tragedy don’t feel unable to express their feelings on social media. It might mean recalibrating what counts as “reckless,” when lies on the internet can mobilize genuine real world threats. Or, it might mean doubling down on protections for the kind of wild, fringe speech Jones engages in. What’s important is we learn to negotiate the balance between speaking safely, and freely, on the web.

More Great WIRED Stories

Who’s Responsible for Your Bad Tech Habits? It’s Complicated

by

First the phones gave. They gave connection and communication. Then they gave music and movies and maps. Then came the apps, and with the apps came… well… everything. And we took it all gladly. But somewhere along the way, the phones began to take, too. They took our attention, distracting us from dates and family dinners. They took our time, devouring hours of our days a few minutes at a time. Public health officials suspect they’ve even taken lives, by contributing to a recent rise in traffic fatalities.

Now, more and more, we want those things back. And as the conversation around tech is increasingly framed in terms of its impact on public health, the question of responsibility for our lopsided relationship with technology becomes more fraught. In a matter of months, the burden of responsibility has managed to spread between individual users, private companies, and governments. And as we determine how to assign culpability and accountability, lessons from the field of public health suggest we should watch carefully to make sure the balance doesn’t tip too far in one direction.

Maybe you think that the responsibility lies with tech giants—the ones that gave us the phones and apps and trained us to check them all compulsively. And you’re partially right. This year has seen Silicon Valley’s biggest companies respond like never before to consumer and investor pressure to restore some of what they’ve taken. In recent months, Google and Apple unveiled system-level tools designed to help users monitor their screen time and restrict their use of apps. Last week, Facebook and Instagram debuted similar features that will live directly inside their applications. The implication of these companies’ actions is clear, if softly stated: People want help unplugging from our products, and they are in a position to help.

But tech companies aren’t the only ones shouldering responsibility for your digital well-being. Increasingly, governments are interceding. A new law in Georgia prohibits drivers from so much as touching their devices unless they’re parked. A bill recently introduced in Congress with bipartisan, bicameral support requested $95 million to study tech’s impact on kids. And in one of the most dramatic government interventions to date, France last week enacted a nationwide ban on smartphone use in schools—a measure French education minister Jean-Michel Blanquer has called “a public health message to families.”

After all: Managing digital dependence has become the responsibility of individuals, as well, hasn’t it? The emerging genre of self-help books that urges people to take control of their technology habits by “finding balance” and “breaking up” with their phones certainly indicates as much. So do the appeals by organizations like Common Sense Media, which implore parents to play an active role policing the quantity and quality of their children’s screen time.

And all that shared responsibility? It’s a good thing—at least in theory. “In matters of public health, you always need a balance to minimize harms,” says Mark Gottlieb, executive director of the Public Health Advocacy Institute and an expert in the origins of responsibility rhetoric in the tobacco and food industries. What the public should pay close attention to, he says, is how that responsibility is allocated.

That’s especially true right now. Because when a new public health issue is first gaining notice, the distribution of accountability actually tends to benefit companies.

Think back to those new time-management tools from Apple, Google, Facebook, and Instagram. “It can seem like they’re taking responsibility, but in a sense they’re actually shielding themselves by placing the onus back on users” says Gottlieb. Nevermind if those tools don’t wind up helping people. (Time will tell, but data from screen-tracking tools like Moment suggest monitoring usage and setting limits on apps does little to reduce the time people spend on their phone). Like warning labels on cigarettes, screen tracking features might provide users with information they’re not fully able to process or act upon. “And if anything bad happens to the user, well, they were warned,” Gottlieb says. “It gives companies a way to defend themselves from criticism by saying, look, we gave you the tools to address the problem, so it’s on you.”

To be clear: Smartphones are not the new cigarettes. The latter is the deadliest technology ever conceived and offers little if any value to society, while the former carries with it monumental, undeniable benefits. I don’t even mean to suggest that smartphones are addictive in the clinical sense, for oh so many reasons. But as public concern over the drawback of digital devices continues to mount, the challenges faced by technology giants could bear an increasingly close resemblance to those met by big tobacco. (If anything, technology’s dual-use nature will make its trials more vexing—not less.) In the months and years to come, as public, private, and political conceptions of accountability become less malleable, ensuring that tech companies continue to take responsibility for their products will depend as much on all of us as it does on them.

More Great WIRED Stories

Meet the Tempest, the UK’s Very British Fighter Jet

by

Tally-ho, chocks away, and jolly good show: The UK’s new Tempest fighter jet will be a decidedly British affair. In July, the UK’s Ministry of Defense announced its new jet will be developed almost exclusively on British soil. The Brits hope the airplane will exhibit the country’s military prowess even as it exits the European Union, and as its traditional defense partners and longtime allies in the United States back into isolationism.

The Royal Air Force’s current key aircraft, the Eurofighter Typhoon and the Lockheed Martin F-35, are both the result of distinctly multinational efforts. The Tempest will learn from these foreign cousins—and try to improve on them. The full-scale mock-up of the sleek aircraft, unveiled at the Farnborough Airshow, is Lockheed F-22 Raptor-esque, with twin engines and two vertical stabilizers. The military called the jet a sixth-generation fighter, which would put the Brits ahead of today’s fifth-gen crop: the US’s F-35 and F-22, Russia’s Sukhoi Su-57, and China’s Chengdu J-20. (All of these countries, plus France and Germany, are also working on sixth-generation aircraft.)

“We are entering a dangerous new era of warfare, so our main focus has to be the future,” noted UK defense secretary Gavin Williamson during the unveiling. “Today, we offer you a glimpse of tomorrow.” The ministry has devoted $2.6 billion to developing the Tempest concept through 2025, and it will decide then whether to roll out a final aircraft by 2035.

Analysts say it’s no surprise that the UK would look to tend its own garden right now. Brexit has isolated the country from its typical European defense partners, like Airbus. Meanwhile, the US has turned inwards. “The fighter is almost more significant politically than technologically or aeronautically,” says Richard Aboulafia, an aviation analyst with the aerospace and defense consultancy Teal Group. This gives the team in charge of engineering the Tempest a particular challenge: learning to reproduce the specialities, and dodge the pitfalls, of other international programs.

Learning From the Cousins

One big hurdle for the Brit-led effort: building highly complex stealth technology, on which the US usually leads. An effective stealth program needs deliberately chosen materials and manufacturing processes, and impeccable design. A slight miss in any of these can become a literal dead giveaway. The Tempest team will also want to take a close look at the American-born F-35’s combat and sensor systems.

But the British will want to improve upon the F-35’s airworthiness. The fifth-gen fighter is sloth-like and weighty—well, for a fighter jet. The concept should get a boost from a new Rolls-Royce engine, which will come equipped with an adaptive cycle engine. This relatively new technology is supposed to optimize the engine for both speed and range, rather than one or the other. The key difference is in the amount of air pushed by front fan blades into the engine core, where it’s mixed with fuel and detonated. (In your conventional commercial jet engine, wider fans push most of the air around the core. These engines are larger, but also quieter.) The adaptive cycle engine should allow the best of both worlds, with components that alter the airflow mid-flight.

The Brits will also want to ensure their fighter jet doesn’t become a money pit. Unlike, ahem, the Lockheed F-22 and F-35, both notoriously over budget and behind schedule. The Royal Air Force knows this too well. It has ordered 135 F-35s over the next decade, for around $12 billion. “The cost of the F-35s the UK has purchased will weigh heavily on how much it can do with the Tempest,” says Aboulafia.

Still, there’s plenty to spend on. Other technologies for the Tempest are in similarly early stages of development. A virtual cockpit could dispense with conventional instruments and switches, but it will need to come a long way in 10 to 15 years if pilots are to feel comfortable without physical instruments in their craft. (If your augmented-reality helmet blinks off mid-combat, you need a backup.) An artificial-intelligence-driven autonomous flight system would allow the aircraft to fly without a pilot on board, coordinating instead with other fighter jets, but will need to be perfected before anyone feels free to liberate their fighter jets of humans.

Of course, the country’s long-standing relationships won’t simply vanish. The UK says it’s seeking additional international partners for the “Team Tempest” program, led today by BAE Systems, Rolls-Royce, the RAF’s Rapid Capabilities Office, multinational European weapons supplier MBDA, and Italian defense contractor Leonardo.

But then, if the British can learn enough from other fighter programs, and their protracted development timelines and cost overruns, it might come out a victor. Aboulafia notes that the outstanding Lockheed F-35 order isn’t necessarily binding, and while the UK has said officially that the new jet won’t affect the F-35 investment, the British can cancel its airplanes at any point and divert funds to the Tempest. Who’s declaring independence now?

More Great WIRED Stories

2019 Ford Mustang Bullitt: Test Drive, Price, Details

by

The lane of oncoming traffic ahead of me is clear, so I use one hand to spin the wheel to the left and point the hood of the car up Pescadero Creek Road. My other hand is cradling the white cue ball that tops the stick shift, and as I tighten my grip, I push the stick forward and away to put the car into third gear.

I back out the clutch and press the accelerator—really, just giving it a little nudge—and my passenger and I go leapfrogging straight up the hill, the exhaust popping and burping behind us. The mighty Brraapp comes rippling up through the back of the car and swats our ears in the same way a wet, low B-flat from the sousaphone in a New Orleans brass band rattles you when you’re standing a little too close but you don’t care because you’re so lost in the heat and the booze and the rhythm. I push down harder toward the floor, and suddenly we’re doing 54 mph straight up the hill. It’s exhilarating.

I shift again, to fourth gear. With each new slot, the pitch of the exhaust goes up and down as the engine speed automatically adjusts to match the new choice of gearing. With the release of the clutch comes another explosion of decibels. Braaaaaah. Suddenly we’re pushing 70. I giggle and say it again, the word I’ve been muttering like a mantra ever since I took the wheel 20 minutes ago, the word that defines this vehicle, the word that should be stamped onto the vanity plate at the factory: Silly.

Chase Me

The beast I’m driving is the 2019 Ford Mustang Bullitt. It’s a special version of the Mustang that Ford developed and brought to market to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the film Bullit. In that movie—if you remember, and I know you do—there’s a famous car chase scene where the good guy (Steve McQueen) drives a green 1968 Mustang fastback as he chases the bad guys’ black Dodge Charger up and down the hills of San Francisco. It’s easily the most beloved car chase in Hollywood history. When audiences saw it in the fall of 1968, it made the young Mustang—then just four years old but already a hit—even more desirable, masculine, and sexy. Never mind Steve McQueen.

The original Bullitt Mustang.

Ford Motor Company

This car, the 2019 Bullitt edition, takes all the greasy DNA of the fetishized original and folds it into a modern Detroit chassis. On paper, the $46,595 Bullitt Mustang is not far removed from Ford’s recent Premium GT model Mustang. It’s got a 5-liter V-8 with 480 horsepower and 420 pound-feet of torque. Top speed is a silly 163 mph. The rev-matching manual transmission has six speeds, and shifting between them is as easy as reciting the alphabet. The performance-tuned suspension is borrowed from the Mustang GT, and the Brembo brakes are painted red so you can see them poking out from behind the front rims. In the dash is a B&O sound system and the Mustang’s brand new all-digital instrument cluster. The car is shaped, of course, like a fastback. Silllly.

Just like the ’68 McQueenmobile, this Mustang comes in “dark highland green” (or straight black, but why would you ever choose that?) and is adorned with choice bits of Bullitt bunting. The film’s logotype-in-crosshairs logo sits at the center of the steering wheel, on the passenger-side dash, and on the dummy gas cap on the rear where the Mustang badge would normally go. Then of course there’s that cue ball shift knob, just like the one in the vehicle that was driven in the movie. When I first walked around the car, I thought all the Bullitt badging felt a bit thirsty, but if you’re buying a Mustang, you really do need to advertise that your Mustang is more rare, more beastly, more obnoxious, and more silly than the all other Mustangs. So be it.

Note the green accents in the interior, the Bullitt logo on the wheel, and the white cue ball on the stick shift.

Ford Motor Company

Sound Transport

I take the Bullitt over the ridge and down to the ocean, where we’ll turn north and run up Pacific Coast Highway. I find some stretches of road where I can just cruise, and I lift my hand off the cue ball to test some of the settings. The only one I’m really interested in fiddling with is the exhaust mode selector. The nasty trumpeting I’ve been spraying all over the Northern California hills for the last hour is the result of Normal mode. I switch it to Quiet. It really is quiet. The car’s bite on the road isn’t lessened one bit, but the air feels suddenly neutered, as if one of the world’s great orators has ceded the podium to a prim accountant who begins reciting quarterly earnings statements. I flip the selector up two notches to Sport mode. The foul bark comes back, deeper and stronger. Dare I try Track mode? I dare. What a woof! I could be considerate of the kind folks enjoying their lunchtime buffets in their cozy homes tucked among the vineyards as we go wheeling past. But no. This is Bullitt. This is American might. Listen to my engine! I purposefully let each gear rev higher than I should before up-shifting just to get the eardrums buzzing. I implore my passenger to say it with me: Silly, silly, silly.

Soon, we are surrounded by minivans and Priuses as we ride tight, afternoon traffic all the way up through Half Moon Bay and into San Francisco. Sadly, this will be the Bullitt experience for most buyers—a modest 42 mph with plenty of red lights. But even when it’s stuck in the pen, the Mustang can smell the open prairies. I can steal three lengths from just about anyone off the line at a green light, and I make a game of it, doing it again and again. Because that’s what bucketloads of horsepower and torque are for. It’s addictive. Even in traffic, I can’t stop giggling.

Mechanical Music

Ford Motor Company

At dusk, Ford corrals the assembled journalists into a cocktail reception at a resort north of San Francisco. Naturally, the bourbon at the open bar is Bulleit. I spend some time chatting with the Ford company reps, all of whom are thrilled to be here, driving this car on the very streets that made it famous. We watch scenes from the 1968 film, we play Bullitt trivia games, we race Bullitt slot cars, and we shoot pool using a custom cue ball with the six-speed transmission mapped on it. We talk about the Mustangs of our youth. I tell them how I learned to drive behind the wheel of my parents’ 1988 Mustang GT convertible, which makes us all smile.

When I ask the Ford guys about the differences between this Bullitt Mustang and the other current Mustangs, they rattle off a few stats but ultimately settle on one point: The key thing this car offers is a visceral experience different from what you get in other Mustangs. When you roll down the window and hear the engine kicking, when you feel the exhaust note curl up the small of your back, when you look down and see that cue ball, you’re getting something wholly unique. It’s fresh and rare and you can’t replicate it in any other car. The original ’68 fastback, which has its own vibe, doesn’t come close. The souped-up Mustang GT doesn’t take you there either. The Bullitt is its own singular and delicious brand of silly.

More Great WIRED Stories

Elon Musk’s Apology, Tesla’s Quarter, Waymo’s Transit Partner, and More Car News This Week

by

When it comes to relationships, even the business kind, sometimes you just have to make nice. That’s what Tesla’s Elon Musk did this week, when he expressed regret about sounding a bit overtaxed during an ultimately upbeat quarterly earnings call for the tumultuous electric carmaker. He’s still in the depths of production hell, you see.Meanwhile, the autonomous developers at Waymo decided to make friends with public transit officials in Phoenix, agreeing to work with them to ensure their driverless vehicles work for seniors and writers with disabilities. And in Sacramento, officials are opening their doors, er, streets to all the Bay Area self-driving developers who are sick of the fog and high housing costs.It’s been a week. Let’s get you caught up.

Headlines

Stories you might have missed from WIRED this week

  • Tesla CEO Elon Musk, not usually one to apologize, did just that on a quarterly earnings call with investors this week, acknowledging he had been “impolite” on his last call with the group. Fortunately, senior writer Jack Stewart reports, Musk also came with good news: Tesla has more in cash reserves than analysts expected, which means it won’t have to borrow money as it continues to ramp up production. And Musk still says the company will be profitable by the end of the year.

  • Musk also used the call to hype insists Tesla’s new self-driving chip, a customized GPU that he says will rival industry lead NVIDIA’s. NVIDIA has, predictably, pushed back on the claim.

  • Could Waymo, the Alphabet self-driving car company, actually make it easier for people to use mass transit? This week, the company rolled out an experiment with Valley Metro, a transit agency in Phoenix, where Waymo tests its driverless cars. One transportation expert told me it’s nice that the self-driving leader is thinking about public transit during this early stage of development—but no one knows what will work yet.

  • Sacramento, the capital of California, wants to prove that it’s tech-savvy but safety-minded. Thus, it announced a $100,000 partnership with Phantom Auto, a company specializing in remote safety operations for totally driverless cars.

Lost Elevator Bank of the Week

Ford lost an elevator lobby; it wants it back. Earlier this year, the automaker made headlines for its purchase of Detroit’s Michigan Central Station, its once-majestic, century-old train station. Now, the station will be the centerpiece for Ford’s trendy, downtown, mobility-focused campus—but not before a serious clean-up and refurbishment effort. Problem is, scavengers and treasure-hunters alike stripped some of Michigan Central’s best features out years ago. Like its waiting room light fixture, and its ticket window, and its elevator lobby. If you have them, and you’re feeling generous (like the mystery person who returned the station’s old clock did), please contact Ford Motor Company.

Ford Motor Company

Required Reading

News from elsewhere on the internet

In the Rearview

Essential stories from WIRED’s past

Way back in 2017, Jack looked at what was then a new trend: companies partnering to build driverless cars. Ah, we were so young then.

Paul Manafort’s Fashion Choices Top This Week’s Internet News Roundup

by

Last week, while the Trump administration unveiled plans to roll back car pollution rules and told the American Civil Liberties Union to find the deported parents it separated from their children, the tallest point in Sweden melted due to climate change, the National Rifle Association announced that it was deep financial trouble, and the US president tried to gaslight the world about whether or not he was late to meet Queen Elizabeth II a couple weeks ago. (He was.) What kind of a crazy world is this, you might be asking? It’s one everyone talks about online. Here’s what else people were talking about on the internet over the past seven days.

Suit Up

What Happened: The first member of Donald Trump’s inner circle went to court, and all the public got out of it was a lot of news stories and some astonishing jackets.

What Really Happened: Last week started with, it seemed, a lot of people interested in someone else’s legal problems. But when that person is former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, about to go on trial for financial fraud in Virginia, that’s somewhat understandable. Manypeopletriedtopre-analyzewhatmighthappen, a situation not helped by the fact that, even before the trial, things were already happening.

But it wasn’t just inside the courthouse that a pre-game show was happening.

So, what is actually at stake here? Somesitesexplainedthebasics, but perhaps all you really need to know is this:

OK, that kind of sentence is pretty intense. Of course, considering his position in the Trump campaign, surely there’s the possibility for him to avoid all of this and just cut a deal to testify in Robert Mueller’s special counsel investigation into potential Russian collusion and obstruction of justice. Who wouldn’t go that route?

Although the courtroom kept cameras out, there were plentyofreportersreadytosharehighlights. The trial itself was … interesting, it seems.

Something that definitely caught the attention of many was a focus on Manafort’s expensive and ridiculous spending on clothes.

But, at least that spoke to Manafort’s … interesting business arrangements.

Yes, for such a high-profile trial, everyone should be thankful that things were staying on topic and not getting weird…

The Takeaway: In case you were wondering, President Trump is totally relaxed about this whole trial, having already explained that he barely knew Manafort.

Never Tweet

What Happened: Someone really needs to tell President Trump to think twice about what he puts on social media.

What Really Happened: With his campaign under investigation and his former campaign chair on trial for financial irregularities, you might think that Trump was prepared to sit back and be silent for once, letting justice run its course. Guess what didn’t happen.

To say that peoplenoticedthatthePresidentoftheUnitedStateshadapparentlyjustobstructedjusticeinplainviewoftheentireworld would be an understatement.

As might be expected, Democratic politicians were quick to respond to what had just happened—

—and, just as obviously, Republicans were less eager to make any kind of comment at all.

Of course, the White House had a different take on the situation, because what else is press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders’ job if not to obfuscate for the Executive Branch? Spin, Sarah, spin!

As was argued, Trump was only offering an opinion and certainly didn’t feel agitated about what’s happening at all…

As it stands, everyone is now wondering whether or not Trump will finally sit down with Robert Mueller’s team to answer questions or not. One report last week suggested that the president really wanted to do it, despite the fears of his own attorneys. His reason? He thinks he can convince investigators that they’re actually carrying out a witch hunt.

The Takeaway: Lost in the whole response to Trump attempting something potentially illegal on Twitter was this small fact: It wasn’t even anything that could have helped, because the president had overlooked another small fact…

The Paper of Record

What Happened: The administration’s war on the media continued apace last week. Hopefully everyone who is such a fan of those constitutional amendments is ready to speak up for the press.

What Really Happened: Elsewhere in Donald Trump news, it was a busy week for the fraught relationship between the president and the media, starting with this surprise tweet over the weekend.

It was a surprise especially for The New York Times, which subsequently released a statement that not only gave more detail into the meeting, but explained, “Mr. Trump’s aides requested that the meeting be off the record, which has also been the practice for such meetings in the past. But with Mr. Trump’s tweet this morning, he has put the meeting on the record.” The Times also released a story about the meeting in the paper, which contained one especially eye-opening moment.

Bear that in mind as we jump to Thursday, and an appearance by Ivanka Trump at an Axios event at the Newseum in Washington, DC, where the First Daughter is asked a particular question…

This becameathinginitself, so much so that President Trump himself tried to walk it back hours later. The discrepancy between the two, however, meant that Thursday’s White House briefing was … worrying:

This, too, turnedintoastoryinitsownright. But who cares that the White House press secretary can’t bring herself to defend the press, right?

The Takeaway: Then again, maybe Ivanka had an ulterior motive in saying what she said, and all of the fallout is just accidental.

Q Who?

What Happened: One of Roseanne Barr’s thought leaders broke through to the mainstream last week, thanks to a Trump rally.

What Really Happened: One of the stranger stories last week came during a Trump rally where a conspiracy theory that had been under the surface for quite some time finallystartedtoget some attention. It all started on Tuesday when folks noticed one letter in particular was making a lot of appearances at the president’s event in Tampa.

Q? This Q?

Apparently not, as fun as the idea of a Star Trek: The Next Generation movement starting at Trump rallies may be. This Q, as it turns out, is something far more disturbing.

Indeed, thanks to the appearances at the rally, the “QAnon” conspiracy theory—in which Trump is a heroic figure pushing back against a conspiracy running America that makes the “Deep State” look like an after-school glee club—wentmainstreamwithallmannerofexplainersanddescriptions. This wasn’t something that went over well with everyone, as some complained that it was merely helping the conspiracy theory become more easily shared (as was apparently happening, it should be noted).

But what drove many people to distraction about the conspiracy theory was the way in which it overlooked actual facts that are happening right now:

As with all conspiracies, the response to this got wonderfully complicated for those into the Dark Web of it all, with Anonymous coming out against Q.

But what’s the scariest thing about this whole subject? How many people eagerly ate up the genuinely mystifying, contradictory nonsense, and what that means for the future.

The Takeaway: But we still don’t know! Who is Q? What could he want, besides simply whipping a whole swath of Americans up into a frenzy for nefarious purposes? If only he’d come forward and tell us what he wan—

Paul Ryan’s Ancestry

What Happened: Turns out, there’s something about Paul Ryan that even Paul Ryan didn’t know. But no one seems to be particularly excited over the news.

What Really Happened: Let’s close the week out with something light. As the result of research carried out for the PBS show Finding Your Roots, Republican speaker of the House and famous fitness fanatic Paul Ryan discovered that hewas, surprisingly, 3 percentJewish. Jewish Twitter was … what’s the opposite of thrilled?

Still, at least Ryan seemed to be excited about it:

Guess how that went down…

The Takeaway: This is getting out of hand. We need someone to bring a sense of perspective here…

More Great WIRED Stories

Best Point and Shoot Cameras (2018): Canon, Sony, Olympus

by

CNMN Collection

© 2018 Condé Nast. All rights reserved.

Use of and/or registration on any portion of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement (updated 5/25/18) and Privacy Policy and Cookie Statement (updated 5/25/18). Your California Privacy Rights. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Condé Nast. Ad Choices.

iPad CTO Kit – including the iPad Tips and Tricks Guide for IT Executives and Managers

by

Get Started

Welcome Back, ().

at

Has your work information changed?

Welcome

Please review the fields below for completeness and accuracy prior to submitting.

Welcome Back, ().

Has your work information changed?

Please Correct the Highlighted Fields Below:

Complete the form below:















Yes No

Hire Me and Get Disability Focus Employer Tax Incentives

by

I have recently been looking into opportunities for myself and found some for you, my employers. Being a Type 1 Diabetic, I am considered to have a disability according to our government. With this disability the following incentives are offered to my hiring public (from https://disability.workforcegps.org):

“Businesses accommodating or hiring employees with disabilities may qualify for tax credits and deductions. There are three federal tax incentives available. They include the Work Opportunity Tax Credit (WOTC), Disabled Access Credit, and Architectural Barrier Removal Tax Deduction. There are also state employer tax incentives. More information and additional resource links are provided within this resource page.

Work Opportunity Tax Credit (WOTC) – This tax credit provides employers incentives to hire qualified individuals from different target groups that are inclusive of people with disabilities. The maximum tax credit could reach as high as $9,600, depending on the employee hired and the length of employment. This link connects you with the latest resources from DOL ETA resource website with program brochure, frequently asked questions, and youtube video providing a helpful program overview.

Disabled Access Credit – This tax credit provides a non-refundable credit for small businesses that incur expenditures for the purpose of providing access to persons with disabilities. This link connects you with helpful background developed by the Job Accommodation Network on this tax vehicle as well as the other two listed on this page.

Architectural and Transportation Barrier Removal Deduction – This tax deduction encourages businesses of any size to remove architectural and transportation barriers to the mobility of persons with disabilities. Businesses may claim a deduction of up to $15,000 a year for qualified expenses for items that normally must be capitalized. This link connects you with the mid-Atlantic ADA Center outlining facts about this tax deduction as well as the other two listed on this page.

State Employer Tax Incentives – Some state-specific tax credit programs for hiring people with disabilities are based on the Federal Government’s Work Opportunity Tax Credit (WOTC) and others are related to accessibility improvements and employment supports. This link from EARN provides an overview of the above three federal tax incentives as well as highlighting examples of state tax incentives implemented by various states from across the U.S.”

Type 1.5 diabetes is a non-official term that is sometimes used to refer to a form of type 1 diabetes known as Latent Autoimmune Diabetes in Adults (LADA).

BioLite FirePit Review: A More Civilized Fire

by

A few years ago, I took a weekend wilderness survival class. Deep in the remote woods of Oregon’s coast range, we strung plastic sheets up with fishing line for shelter and practiced signaling with tiny pocket mirrors. Enthralled, I watched as the instructor slowly teased a cotton ball daubed with petroleum jelly into a roaring campfire.

Survival class aside, fire starting isn’t one of my skills. I am far more likely to get exasperated and start dumping a bottle of white gas onto a pile of wood (which is not a WIRED-endorsed practice, by the way!) than I am to painstakingly craft lichen and kindling into a cozy home for a newborn flame. Luckily, with the BioLite FirePit, I don’t need to.

The FirePit is a sleek, portable, mesh box with removable legs, a hibachi-style grill, and an ash bin. It has a rechargeable 10,400 mAh battery that can power 51 air jets for up to 26 hours. And it’s Bluetooth-compatible, so you can precisely control the airflow—and how high the flames go—on your phone.

While you can charge your phone with the FirePit, the heat generated from the flames does not automatically recharge the FirePit’s battery pack, as with BioLite’s other stoves. So if you’re looking for a product that will let you cook food and charge devices in a natural disaster, the FirePit won’t be your first pick.

But if you want to quickly grill kabobs at a backyard or beachside gathering, the FirePit is as good at sparking conversation as it is flames.

Earth, Wind and Fire

With wildfires raging all over the western United States and ground fires forbidden in many locations, a portable fire pit is a very attractive option for summer car campers. The FirePit is particularly toteable, since it weighs less than 20 pounds, and is only 10 inches high with the retractable legs stowed. I can easily carry it with the side handles, and it also comes with a carry cover.

BioLite also cautions users to not set it up on a wood deck or dry grass. Nothing will ruin a backyard gathering faster than setting your house alight. I set my tester unit up on our slate backyard patio, charged the battery pack via micro USB (which took about four hours to go from 25 percent to 100 percent), and downloaded the BioLite app to my phone.

If you’ve ever used a charcoal grill, you’ll find the FirePit’s setup to be familiar. Air tubes run through the bottom of the unit, with a fuel rack in the inside. If you’re burning wood logs, set the fuel rack on the bottom, and if you’re cooking with charcoal, set the rack on the higher hooks.

If you choose to burn wood, the fuel rack can only accommodate 16-inch logs, and only up to four of them at that. Being able to adjust the airflow in the FirePit is a huge boon to getting a good fire started, but when working with so few logs, it does take a little skill.

I suggest keeping a hatchet and a few different types of kindling, like paper or small dry sticks, on hand. Not white gas or lighter fluid—the FirePit is not intended for use with any liquid fuel. If you’re trying to get a fire started, keeping the fan setting on low at first. The high setting is great for making the flames in a fire leap, but not for coaxing a bit of tinder to catch. The first time we used the FirePit, my spouse made the mistake of blasting the fragile sparks with air and just blew them all out.

Once you’re finished with flames for the evening, the FirePit is cools off really quickly and is easy to clean. I just took the fuel rack off the hooks and dumped the ash into our metal trash bin, then opened the sliding trap door to shake the rest of the ash out.

Smoke Gets In Your Eyes

The FirePit is not precisely smokeless, as BioLite claims. But it does do a much better job than our old fire pit of ventilating smoke, burning fuel more efficiently, and keeping stray embers contained. It was relaxing to sit around a fire without constantly circling around it to avoid smoke plumes. I also felt much better about having small children dashing madly around the patio.

It made cooking much easier, too. If you have a FirePit, you don’t need a separate grill, fire pit, and chimney firestarter. I used the FirePit for all three functions in the course of one evening. BioLite advises you to set the fuel rack higher up to cook over charcoal, but I didn’t like the idea of gingerly transferring it to the lower setting with a bunch of hot coals in the rack.

I set the fan to low and used kindling to start a fire with wood lumps in the lower rack setting. Once the charcoal started burning, I ramped up the air a little bit to get a little char on my chicken and veggie kabobs. The skewers fit perfectly across the grilling grate, and they finished cooking in a few minutes. After I was done, I just slid the cooking grate over, added a few logs to the hot coal base, and turned down the air.

The battery has a remarkably long life. Over a week of evening wood fires on low power, I only needed to charge it once. The app lets you know how long the battery life will be at each fan setting. At full charge, it has approximately 26 hours at low power, and at max power, about three. I grilled for an hour and had plenty of battery to last through the rest of the evening.

It’s a really big bummer that the FirePit can’t generate its own power from heat. BioLite’s other cooking stoves, the CampStove and the BaseCamp, have won devoted fans in both developing countries and in disaster-prone parts of the United States for being not only a great cooking tool, but a quick and highly efficient power source.

The FirePit does have an optional waterproof carry cover that also collects solar energy to recharge the battery. Just don’t count on it doing so particularly fast, since BioLite states that it will take 3-5 days in direct sun the cover to charge the FirePit entirely.

Finally, the FirePit might do too good a job at containing heat. We were all able to sit within a few feet of the FirePit and not feel any warmth. While that’s appreciated on a balmy summer evening, it means cold and rainy winter ones will probably be a lot less cozy. At least we can hike up the flames a little bit to cook s’mores.

Fire Fly

Going camping without a fire is like…well, it’s not like anything. Camping without a fire hardly seems like camping at all. Portable fire pits, like BioLite’s, are a great way to exercise your pyromanic tendencies while obeying campsite rules and protecting vulnerable areas from fire damage.

You won’t be able to show off your Bear Grylls skills with a Bluetooth-enabled fan gently nudging your flames up to cooking height. But you also won’t be spraying noxious flammable liquids everywhere, either, or smelling like smoke for days. That seems like a more-than-decent tradeoff to me.

Best Weekend Deals: SNES Classic, Apple Watch, Dell XPS

by

The best things in life are free, but the next-best things are sometimes available at a steep discount. We’re pretty excited about the finds that we were able to pull together this week, with the help of our pals at TechBargains. The Nintendo Super NES Classic isn’t below its MSRP, but it’s such a rare treat to see them in stock. If tiny retro gaming consoles aren’t your bag, we also have ever-useful Apple AirPods and other discounted picks for you to peruse.

The Super NES Classic Is Back in Stock

For an entire generation, the Super NES was an introduction to the world of video games. It’s been almost impossible to get your hands on any of Nintendo’s mini-retro consoles and their lineup of iconic games. So click on this while you still can.Buy the SNES Classic for $80.

Gaming and TV Deals

Computer Deals, Apple Gear, and More

When you buy something using the retail links in our stories, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Read more about how this works.

Welcome to the Gutenberg Editor

by

Of Mountains & Printing Presses

The goal of this new editor is to make adding rich content to WordPress simple and enjoyable. This whole post is composed of pieces of content—somewhat similar to LEGO bricks—that you can move around and interact with. Move your cursor around and you’ll notice the different blocks light up with outlines and arrows. Press the arrows to reposition blocks quickly, without fearing about losing things in the process of copying and pasting.

What you are reading now is a text block, the most basic block of all. The text block has its own controls to be moved freely around the post…

… like this one, which is right aligned.

Headings are separate blocks as well, which helps with the outline and organization of your content.

A Picture is worth a Thousand Words

Handling images and media with the utmost care is a primary focus of the new editor. Hopefully, you’ll find aspects of adding captions or going full-width with your pictures much easier and robust than before.

Beautiful landscape
If your theme supports it, you’ll see the “wide” button on the image toolbar. Give it a try.

Try selecting and removing or editing the caption, now you don’t have to be careful about selecting the image or other text by mistake and ruining the presentation.

The Inserter Tool

Imagine everything that WordPress can do is available to you quickly and in the same place on the interface. No need to figure out HTML tags, classes, or remember complicated shortcode syntax. That’s the spirit behind the inserter—the (+) button you’ll see around the editor—which allows you to browse all available content blocks and add them into your post. Plugins and themes are able to register their own, opening up all sort of possibilities for rich editing and publishing.

Go give it a try, you may discover things WordPress can already add into your posts that you didn’t know about. Here’s a short list of what you can currently find there:

  • Text & Headings
  • Images & Videos
  • Galleries
  • Embeds, like YouTube, Tweets, or other WordPress posts.
  • Layout blocks, like Buttons, Hero Images, Separators, etc.
  • And Lists like this one of course 🙂

Visual Editing

A huge benefit of blocks is that you can edit them in place and manipulate your content directly. Instead of having fields for editing things like the source of a quote, or the text of a button, you can directly change the content. Try editing the following quote:

The editor will endeavour to create a new page and post building experience that makes writing rich posts effortless, and has “blocks” to make it easy what today might take shortcodes, custom HTML, or “mystery meat” embed discovery.

Matt Mullenweg, 2017

The information corresponding to the source of the quote is a separate text field, similar to captions under images, so the structure of the quote is protected even if you select, modify, or remove the source. It’s always easy to add it back.

Blocks can be anything you need. For instance, you may want to add a subdued quote as part of the composition of your text, or you may prefer to display a giant stylized one. All of these options are available in the inserter.

You can change the amount of columns in your galleries by dragging a slider in the block inspector in the sidebar.

Media Rich

If you combine the new wide and full-wide alignments with galleries, you can create a very media rich layout, very quickly:

Accessibility is important don't forget image alt attribute

Sure, the full-wide image can be pretty big. But sometimes the image is worth it.

The above is a gallery with just two images. It’s an easier way to create visually appealing layouts, without having to deal with floats. You can also easily convert the gallery back to individual images again, by using the block switcher.

Any block can opt into these alignments. The embed block has them also, and is responsive out of the box:

Need to make this responsive

You can build any block you like, static or dynamic, decorative or plain. Here’s a pullquote block:

Code is Poetry

The WordPress community

If you want to learn more about how to build additional blocks, or if you are interested in helping with the project, head over to the GitHub repository.

Help build Gutenberg

Thanks for testing Gutenberg!

?

Rare Footage Shows The Incredible Way Geese Protect Themselves From Hail

by

So, why are the geese doing this? Likely, says Ross, it’s to protect their sensitive beaks from being damaged with a direct hit — an injury which could easily be life-threatening.

This behavior has been observed in other species by other researchers in the past, but the video above may offer even more insight into just how clever this group of geese is.

“A few individuals seem to be actually reacting to individual hailstones,” Ross told Live Science. “So not only are they looking up into the sky to reduce their profile, but perhaps when a hailstone was imminently going to hit them in the face, they dodge[d] it really quickly.”

While there’s still more to be studied about this behavior, there seems to be one obvious takeaway — it pays to look up.

Family Sees Giant Tangled Shark And Drops Everything To Help Her

by

Joby Rohrer and his family were enjoying a day of diving off the coast of Lanai, Hawaii, when they spotted something that made them change their plans.

There, in the water not far from them, was a massive whale shark. Wrapped around her was a large rope, strangling her body.

What Rohrer didn’t know at the time was that, a few weeks earlier, this same animal had been spotted. Wildlife officials were urging the public to alert them if she was sighted again.

Woman Throws A Lavish Quinceañera For Her Rescue Chihuahua

by

“Lupita is a rescue dog I found on the streets who was abused previously,” her owner, Miranda Sanchez, told The Dodo.

That was two years ago, and things since then have never been better. But recently Sanchez realized that there was an opportunity to celebrate her little pup in an extra special way — by throwing her a quinceañera party, and inviting all their pals.

Cops Get Call That Someone Strange Locked Himself Inside A Car

by

The Jefferson County Sheriff’s Office posted about the (unfortunately) not-too-unusual incident involving an opportunistic bear, hoping others take note.

“We’ve often warned that leaving your car unlocked makes it easier for thieves to steal items, but, as we’ve now seen twice this past week, it also makes it easier for bears to climb in and make themselves at home,” officials wrote online.

It was far from a clean getaway for this particular bear. After entering the car, he helped himself to some snacks the owner had left behind, accidentally closing the door behind him in the process. Unable to escape, he reportedly took a nap.

The responding officers needed to free him. As seen in this video, they used a rope to open the car’s door from a safe distance:

Pug Who Wanted To See The World Ends Up With A Stinky Job

by

While little is known for certain about the pug, or why he ran away from his home in Escobedo, Mexico, we can only guess that the coziness of domestic life was too confining for his adventuresome spirit. This pup evidently wanted to see the world.

But he didn’t make it far — and the pup’s time as a carefree traveler was short-lived.

Turns out, a pair of local garbage collectors from Red Ambiental, a waste management service, spotted the dog out and about on his own and decided to “rescue” him. Since he wasn’t wearing a collar, they plopped him into the cab of their garbage truck and continued along their route as a trio.

And that’s how the liberty-seeking pug found himself here: