40 CMS Vendors from Gartner Market Guide

Traditional CMS tools typically require the use of specific frameworks and languages, whereas headless CMS tools let developers use whichever framework they are comfortable with. … A headless CMS is flexible and future-proof, allowing it to power other platforms even if they are not in your current product roadmap.

Vendor Product name Category
Drupal Cloud
Traditional
Adobe Experience Manager
Traditional
Dynamic Content
Headless CMS
WordPress VIP
Traditional
Bloomreach Experience Manager (brXM)
Traditional
Brightspot CMS
Traditional
ButterCMS
Headless CMS
Contentful
Headless CMS
Contentstack
Headless CMS
CoreMedia Content Cloud
Traditional
Crafter CMS
Headless CMS
Crownpeak DXM
Traditional
DatoCMS
Headless CMS
 DNN (DotNetNuke)
Evoq Content
Traditional
dotCMS
Traditional
Content Studio
Traditional
Episerver Content Cloud
Traditional
FirstSpirit
Traditional
Cascade CMS
Traditional
Hubspot CMS
Traditional
 Ibexa (formerly eZ Systems)
eZ Platform
Traditional
Ingeniux CMS Experience Platform
Traditional
jContent
Traditional
Kentico Kontent
Headless CMS
Magnolia
Traditional
OU Campus
Traditional
OpenText TeamSite
Traditional
Oracle Content and Experience Cloud
Headless CMS
Pimcore Open Source WCM
Traditional
Sitefinity CMS
Traditional
Salesforce CMS
Traditional
 SDL
SDL Tridion Sites
Traditional
Experience Manager
Traditional
Squiz Matrix
Traditional
Strapi
Headless CMS
Digital Engagement and Web Development Platform
Traditional
Arc Publishing
Headless CMS
Umbraco CMS
Traditional
WP Engine
Traditional
Zesty.io
Headless CMS

Market Recommendations

Figure 1 TargetApplication leaders transforming WCM should:
  • Mitigate the difficulty of selecting vendors by including selection criteria that are more extensive than solely for the web channel.
  • Replace their legacy project- and program-based approaches to WCM by adopting a blended approach of traditional and new methods aligned to the business strategy.
  • Plan to include interactive evaluation techniques, such as demonstrations and proofs of concept, in the evaluation of WCM technology to mitigate the difficulty of selecting vendors purely based on functionality checklists.
  • Recalibrate their strategies for deploying and managing content by using the “2020 Strategic Roadmap for Web Content Management” framework.
  • Check customer references and speak to them about “softer” selection criteria such as cultural fit, ease of working with vendor, geographical coverage, partner network and availability of experts
  • Evaluate the extent to which WCM requirements can be provided by other types of technologies they may already have in place.
  • Define their long-term digital experience strategy and how a WCM (or DXP) would fit into their current and planned technology portfolio, as well as what adjacent technologies they will need to integrate with.
  • Utilize the WCM technology selection best practices as highlighted in “How to Shortlist WCM Vendors for Your Digital Business Strategy.”

Note: Representative Vendor Selection

The vendors named in this guide were selected as representative vendors. We list the vendors in which Gartner has received the most client interest (searches on Gartner.com and inquiry).

Evidence

The 2019 Gartner Strategy Survey covered 342 respondents from six countries and eight industry groups, with enterprises ranging in size from $250 million in revenue to over $10 billion. Qualified respondents were senior executives who are involved in making decisions on business strategy, including both CIOs and non-IT roles. The primary research was conducted online from July through August 2019. The study was developed collaboratively by Gartner analysts and the Research Data and Analytics team.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *